Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 6 of 67
1 category · RankedIntrow
35Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in PRM for small business buyers
Rank 15 of 61 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Introw →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 69
2%16 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market15 of 61
0%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise14 of 60
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In prm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Introw for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partner relationship management | Partner and channel | 0% | 15 of 61 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Introw held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · PRM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 14 of 59
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 12 of 53
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 15 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Introw across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Introw across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels1
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative9 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“alternatives like Introw and Partnerplace are recommended instead” Mistral Small · PRM · negative prompt · first choice
“Choose Introw if: You want an AI-first approach that integrates deeply with your CRM” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PRM · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you run HubSpot and want extreme agility: Look closely at Introw or Kiflo.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PRM · direct prompt · alternative
“Introw and Partnerplace (mentioned as "safe picks" with no commission fees)” Kimi K2 · PRM · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Introw, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Introw was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Introw, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Introw was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Introw. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 35 answers that named Introw and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com22
introw.ioYour site17
partnerportal.io17
partnerplace.io15
guideflow.com14
zinfi.com14
learn.g2.com13
kiflo.com11
pipedrive.com11
channelinsider.com10
127 of the 144 domain citations in answers naming Introw came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
introw.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Introw takes 0% of first choices and PartnerPortal.io takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
introw.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Introw takes 0% of first choices and PartnerPortal.io takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “partner relationship management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best partner relationship management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“introw”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,213 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 387 · 3 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 522
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 61 in PRM
Segment leader
22%
PartnerPortal.io
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 35 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 35 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on introw.io
1,368
subdomains included
Content
688
counted in the table below
Documentation
563
Product · Integration
19 · 14
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 248 | 3 | 2026-09-28 | CRM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 234 | 87 | 2026-08-17 | ABM, CRM | |
| Blog | 124 | 29 | 2026-09-16 | PRM, CPQ | |
| Comparison | 38 | 7 | 2026-09-03 | PRM, CPQ | |
| Case study | 15 | 15 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 15 | 14 | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Conference or event | 10 | 4 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| News or press | 4 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-285 use cases how claude can scale your partner program report or ebook
- 2026-09-28Hubspot blueprint for b2b saas report or ebook
- 2026-09-22Aikido case study
- 2026-09-16Unbound 2026 conference or event
- 2026-09-16Through channel marketing automation blog
- 2026-09-15Dreamforce 2026 conference or event
Events in person
Last twelve months
- September 17, 2026Ping Pong Partner ConnectSPIN Boston, Boston · hosted
- September 16, 2026 to September 18, 2026UNBOUND 2026Boston, Thomas M. Menino Convention & Exhibition Center, Boston · exhibited
- June 17, 2026 to June 19, 2026VivaTech Paris 2026Paris Expo Porte de Versailles · exhibited
- June 2, 2026 to June 4, 2026Money 20/20 Amsterdam 2026RAI Amsterdam · took part
As the event pages on introw.io state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page introw.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CRM (16); 10 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Introw
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Introw is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Introw is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- #1 Agentic Partnership Management Platform
- For
- partnership professionals
- Price stated
- Free introw.io
- Starting price
- 0 introw.io
- Free plan or trial
- Start for free introw.io
- Integrations claimed
- 100 introw.io · 5 introw.io/product/cpq pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOCII Type 2ISO27001GDPR compliantSOC2 Type 2SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001GDPRSSO
- Customers named
- FactorialCoderRingoverQuattAikidoCumulocityZenitySedai
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Introw's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: introw.io, introw.io/pricing, trust.introw.io, introw.io/product/cpq, introw.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Introw's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Introw, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Introw by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Introw is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Introw, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.