Four of fourteen models named Channeltivity first on the direct prompt; three named Channelscaler. Channeltivity was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Channelscaler by thirteen and Channeltivity carries 35 labels and Channelscaler 38, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
San Mateo, United States, founded 2010. Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the partner relationship management page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Channeltivity and Channelscaler were named in the same answer fifty-six times, of the 114 answers naming Channeltivity and the 147 naming Channelscaler. In those answers Channelscaler took the first choice nine times and Channeltivity five.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“Channeltivity ($1,899/month) ... making them unsuitable for limited budgets” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Check it carefully if you need extensive customization, complex regional partner structures, or highly tailored dashboards and reporting.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Channeltivity (for small/medium businesses) ... These enterprise-grade tools can take 3–6 months to deploy properly” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Channeltivity: Highly rated for mid-market. It is incredibly easy to set up, requires almost zero IT overhead, and has superb Salesforce and HubSpot integrations.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“If your priority is channel sales (resellers, distributors) and deal management, Channeltivity is the top choice.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Channeltivity is widely considered the gold standard for "plug-and-play" mid-market PRM.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Allbound require custom pricing and typically run $1,000+/month, making them unsuitable for limited budgets” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Are merging/rebranding products (Channelscaler's current instability)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“These would be overkill for a company with a limited budget.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“For most mid-sized B2B companies today, Allbound offers the best balance of price, ease of implementation, and partner engagement.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I recommend starting with Channeltivity or Allbound as they offer the best balance of features, usability, and value” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“For a 500-person company, mid-market PRMs like Allbound, Impartner, or Zift are often the best fit” Mistral Small · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.