AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Email signatures › Exclaimer vs CodeTwo Email Signatures 365
Email signature management · October 2026 Edition

Exclaimer vs CodeTwo Email Signatures 365

Nine of fourteen models named Exclaimer first on the direct prompt; two named CodeTwo Email Signatures 365. Both were named by all fourteen models and Exclaimer carries 64 labels and CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 54, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Exclaimer

endorsed leader

Named in one category this edition.

CodeTwo Email Signatures 365

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share33%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%15%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels6454A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Exclaimer reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.WiseStamp was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Exclaimer vs WiseStamp · Exclaimer vs Signitic · Exclaimer vs SyncSignature

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the email signature management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ExclaimerFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCodeTwo Email Signatures 365
Direct92
Paraphrase62
Comparative92
Budget-constrained106 against Exclaimer · 1 against CodeTwo Email Signatures 365
Scale-constrained10
Negative116 against Exclaimer · 7 against CodeTwo Email Signatures 365
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Exclaimer and CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 were named in the same answer 138 times, of the 189 answers naming Exclaimer and the 155 naming CodeTwo Email Signatures 365. In those answers CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 took the first choice thirteen times and Exclaimer sixty-two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Exclaimer and CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Exclaimer CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Exclaimer on the left and CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Exclaimer and CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Gemini 3.5 FlashCodeTwo Email Signatures 365, Exclaimer alternatives: Newoldstamp, Opensense, Signitic

Exclaimer first, CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 an alternative

8 of 14 modelsCodeTwo Email Signatures 365 was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Exclaimer alternatives: CodeTwo Email Signatures 365, Newoldstamp, Rocketseed
GPT-5.4 miniExclaimer alternatives: CodeTwo Email Signatures 365
Perplexity SonarExclaimer alternatives: Letsignit, Opensense, Rocketseed, WiseStamp
Grok 4.1 FastExclaimer alternatives: CodeTwo Email Signatures 365, WiseStamp
Mistral SmallExclaimer, WiseStamp alternatives: CodeTwo Email Signatures
DeepSeek V4 FlashExclaimer alternatives: CodeTwo Email Signatures 365, WiseStamp
Llama 4 MaverickExclaimer, WiseStamp alternatives: Opensense
Muse Glimmer 30BExclaimer, WiseStamp alternatives: Opensense

CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 first, Exclaimer an alternative

1 of 14 modelsExclaimer was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-6 LunaCodeTwo Email Signatures 365 alternatives: Exclaimer

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Qwen 3.7 FlashWiseStamp alternatives: Exclaimer, Opensense
Kimi K2WiseStamp alternatives: Exclaimer
GLM 4.7 FlashXSyncSignature alternatives: CodeTwo Email Signatures 365, Exclaimer, Letsignit
MiniMax M2.5WiseStamp alternatives: Exclaimer, Opensense

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Exclaimer leads by twenty-one points.
Exclaimer26%#1 of 9
CodeTwo Email Signatures 3655%#6 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Exclaimer leads by twenty-five points.
Exclaimer33%#1 of 9
CodeTwo Email Signatures 3658%#4 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Exclaimer leads by thirty-nine points.
Exclaimer59%#1 of 7
CodeTwo Email Signatures 36520%#2 of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Exclaimer

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“One Exclaimer review specifically mentions discomfort with having emails routed through a "random server"... "can cause mail routing issues with Barracuda"” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“significantly more affordable than enterprise solutions like Exclaimer or Rocketseed, which typically require custom pricing and higher minimum spends” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Competitors like Exclaimer (~$0.90-$1.50/user/mo but often higher for small biz)... either lack a solid free tier or require minimums/commitments.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“Choose Exclaimer if you are a large enterprise, heavily invested in Microsoft 365, and need the most comprehensive security certifications” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Exclaimer if you need enterprise-grade control, strong compliance credentials, and reliable organization-wide enforcement.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
“Widely recognized enterprise leader with the broadest certification set; reliable and battle-tested across massive Microsoft 365 estates” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about CodeTwo Email Signatures 365

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 - Outlook Integration Issues: Signatures sometimes not displaying immediately or old signatures persisting unexpectedly” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Lacks SCIM ... These gaps make it unsuitable for regulated industries” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools like CodeTwo and Exclaimer sometimes face complaints about Outlook rendering inconsistencies, slow syncing, or steep learning curves” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“If your company is Microsoft 365‑only and IT prefers to manage governance centrally, CodeTwo Email Signatures 365 is the best choice.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If your B2B organization runs entirely on Microsoft 365 and Outlook, CodeTwo is widely considered the gold standard.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“centralized, server-side platforms like Exclaimer, CodeTwo, and Letsignit as the safer class of tools” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.