| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data clean rooms | GTM data and infrastructure | 15% | 2 of 100 | 7% | 42 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“AWS Clean Rooms is often the safer default because the pricing is usage-based and there's no separate license to buy just to get started” GPT-5.4 mini · Data clean rooms · budget prompt · first choice
“AWS Clean Rooms is the top recommendation for most small businesses due to its pay-as-you-go pricing and free tier” Mistral Small · Data clean rooms · budget prompt · first choice
“Already on AWS → AWS Clean Rooms pay-as-you-go is the most budget-friendly entry point, no big upfront investment.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Data clean rooms · budget prompt · first choice
“highlight cloud-native ones like AWS/Snowflake for lower barriers—ideal for mid-market avoiding heavy IT builds” Grok 4.20 · Data clean rooms · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Pay-per-use (CRPU-hours); no free tier; costs can escalate quickly” Kimi K2 · Data clean rooms · budget prompt · hard negative
“Cloud-based (e.g., AWS Clean Rooms, Snowflake, Databricks) | Strong infrastructure, but integration complexity and variable TCO” Grok 4.20 · Data clean rooms · negative prompt · soft negative
“Snowflake and AWS Clean Rooms get reasonable marks when properly configured — but watch for the cost/complexity pitfalls” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Data clean rooms · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 136 of the 142 answers that named AWS Clean Rooms and are not a share of its labels.
No domain is on file for AWS Clean Rooms, so its own site is not marked.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AWS Clean Rooms's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AWS Clean Rooms, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AWS Clean Rooms by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AWS Clean Rooms is among the products AI models recommend first in Data clean rooms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.