| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data clean rooms | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 12 of 100 | 12% | 16 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“start with the free walled-garden options (Google, Amazon, Meta)” MiniMax M2.5 · Data clean rooms · budget prompt · first choice
“Meta's proprietary clean room is free to use (currently in gated beta) for advertisers running heavy campaigns on Meta.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data clean rooms · budget prompt · alternative
“the Walled Gardens (AMC, ADH, MAA) are the most immediate and cost-effective tools” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Data clean rooms · comparative prompt · alternative
“Meta's clean room offering for advertisers on their platforms. Zero licensing cost.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Data clean rooms · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Walled garden DCRs are incredibly powerful, but only within their own ecosystems. They are plagued by severe vendor lock-in.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data clean rooms · negative prompt · soft negative
“Walled Gardens (e.g., Google, Meta, Amazon) | Limited interoperability; lock-in to their ecosystem” Grok 4.1 Fast · Data clean rooms · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 38 answers that named Meta Advanced Analytics and are not a share of its labels.
160 of the 160 domain citations in answers naming Meta Advanced Analytics came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Meta Advanced Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Meta Advanced Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Meta Advanced Analytics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: