AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Meta Advanced Analytics · October 2026 Edition
Meta · 1 category · Ranked

Meta Advanced Analytics

38Judge labels
2First choices
12Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Data clean rooms for mid-market buyers
Rank 12 of 100 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Meta Advanced Analytics →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In data clean rooms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Meta Advanced Analytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Data clean roomsGTM data and infrastructure2%12 of 10012%16accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Meta Advanced Analytics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Meta Advanced Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01113
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01012
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01304
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained10 labels1
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“start with the free walled-garden options (Google, Amazon, Meta)” MiniMax M2.5 · Data clean rooms · budget prompt · first choice
“Meta's proprietary clean room is free to use (currently in gated beta) for advertisers running heavy campaigns on Meta.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data clean rooms · budget prompt · alternative
“the Walled Gardens (AMC, ADH, MAA) are the most immediate and cost-effective tools” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Data clean rooms · comparative prompt · alternative
“Meta's clean room offering for advertisers on their platforms. Zero licensing cost.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Data clean rooms · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Walled garden DCRs are incredibly powerful, but only within their own ecosystems. They are plagued by severe vendor lock-in.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data clean rooms · negative prompt · soft negative
“Walled Gardens (e.g., Google, Meta, Amazon) | Limited interoperability; lock-in to their ecosystem” Grok 4.1 Fast · Data clean rooms · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Meta Advanced Analytics, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Meta Advanced Analytics was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Snowflake Data Clean Rooms30 of 387Not among the top eight
Amazon Marketing Cloud29 of 389Not among the top eight
Google Ads Data Hub29 of 388Not among the top eight
LiveRamp Clean Room23 of 384Not among the top eight
AWS Clean Rooms22 of 383Not among the top eight
InfoSum22 of 380Not among the top eight
Databricks Clean Rooms17 of 380Not among the top eight
Decentriq14 of 380Not among the top eight
Habu13 of 380Not among the top eight
TikTok PrivacyGo9 of 380Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Meta Advanced Analytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 38 answers that named Meta Advanced Analytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

digitalapplied.com32
guideflow.com19
decentriq.com18
data-axle.com17
gartner.com14
liveramp.com14
dataknobs.com12
sourceforge.net12
aws.amazon.com11
g2.com11

160 of the 160 domain citations in answers naming Meta Advanced Analytics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Meta Advanced Analytics stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
90 a month (“meta advanced analytics”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Its own site
It sits on Meta's site (meta.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 100 in data clean rooms
Segment leader
19%
Snowflake Data Clean Rooms
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
38 answers
Its own site cited
in 35 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Meta Advanced Analytics

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Meta Advanced Analytics; a claim can dispute any of them.
Meta 3Meta Advanced Analytics (AA) 2Meta (Partnership Clean Room) 1Meta Advanced Analytics (MAA) 1

Follow Meta Advanced Analytics

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Meta Platforms is the company behind Meta Advanced Analytics.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Website
meta.com
Headquarters
Menlo Park, United States
Founded
2004
Employees
about 58,604 (2020)
Ownership
Public, META on Nasdaq

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Meta Advanced Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Meta Advanced Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Meta Advanced Analytics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Meta Advanced Analytics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Meta Advanced Analytics, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at meta.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.