1 category · RankedDecentriq
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data clean rooms | GTM data and infrastructure | 3% | 7 of 100 | 11% | 28 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Decentriq across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“neutral, pure-play DCR vendors with hardware-backed privacy ... These include: Decentriq (confidential computing/hardware-backed)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Data clean rooms · negative prompt · first choice
“Optable or Decentriq are commonly cited data clean room options” Muse Glimmer 30B · Data clean rooms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with either Decentriq or InfoSum” MiniMax M2.5 · Data clean rooms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Security-first vendors like Decentriq trade network scale for hardware-enforced confidentiality, which matters for regulated industries.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Data clean rooms · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“positioned more for regulated or security-heavy use cases, which usually makes it less budget-oriented” Perplexity Sonar · Data clean rooms · budget prompt · soft negative
“these enterprise-grade platforms are almost always a classic case of over-engineering” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data clean rooms · direct prompt · soft negative
“like LiveRamp (Habu), InfoSum, or Decentriq is rarely feasible” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data clean rooms · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Decentriq, over the 87 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Decentriq was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 86 of the 87 answers that named Decentriq and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
293 of the 372 domain citations in answers naming Decentriq came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
decentriq.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Decentriq takes 3% of first choices and Snowflake Data Clean Rooms takes 19%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“decentriq”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 911 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 349 · 44 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,024
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 6 across its categories
- Named in
- 87 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 86 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 112 | 5 | 2026-08-11 | DMP, CRM | |
| Podcast or video | 17 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 15 | 0 | 2026-06-12 | CDP | |
| Case study | 10 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2026-06-11 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-11Yougov joins decentriq network blog
- 2026-07-30Attribution when you cant share customer data with the platform blog
- 2026-07-28Cross media reach and frequency blog
- 2026-07-17Conversion lift measurement clean rooms blog
- 2026-07-08Clean rooms privacy safe media measurement blog
- 2026-06-29Why gdpr stalls european data collaboration blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page decentriq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Decentriq
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Decentriq's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Decentriq, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Decentriq by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Decentriq is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Decentriq, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.