| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partner relationship management | Partner and channel | 0% | 17 of 50 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Channeltivity at 24% |
| Referral and partner programs | Partner and channel | 0% | 31 of 107 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 19% |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 31 of 108 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Crossbeam if your biggest need is account mapping and co-sell opportunity discovery” Perplexity Sonar · Referrals · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Excels at ecosystem discovery via secure CRM data sharing/account overlap for co-selling” Grok 4.1 Fast · Referrals · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Not a full PRM, but excellent if you want ecosystem data sharing and account mapping” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Channel marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Free plan supports up to 5 users — Best for very small teams just getting started” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PRM · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“It is not a referral tracking or PRM tool. It does not handle commissions, payout tracking, or provide a partner portal.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Referrals · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 25 answers that named Crossbeam and are not a share of its labels.
Seventeen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming Crossbeam came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Crossbeam's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Crossbeam, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crossbeam.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.