GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Crossbeam · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Crossbeam

28Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in PRM for mid-market buyers
Rank 17 of 50 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In prm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Crossbeam for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Partner relationship managementPartner and channel0%17 of 500%5under 10 labels · led by Channeltivity at 24%
Referral and partner programsPartner and channel0%31 of 10720%5under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 19%
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel0%31 of 1080%4under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Crossbeam yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Crossbeam across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash03104
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX01203
MiniMax M2.501102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase13 labels1
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Crossbeam if your biggest need is account mapping and co-sell opportunity discovery” Perplexity Sonar · Referrals · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Excels at ecosystem discovery via secure CRM data sharing/account overlap for co-selling” Grok 4.1 Fast · Referrals · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Not a full PRM, but excellent if you want ecosystem data sharing and account mapping” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Channel marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Free plan supports up to 5 users — Best for very small teams just getting started” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PRM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“It is not a referral tracking or PRM tool. It does not handle commissions, payout tracking, or provide a partner portal.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Referrals · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Crossbeam, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Crossbeam was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
PartnerStack20 of 254Not in the top three
Impartner12 of 253Not in the top three
Unifyr11 of 250Not in the top three
Kiflo9 of 253Not in the top three
JourneyBee8 of 251Not in the top three
Salesforce PRM8 of 250Not in the top three
PartnerPortal.io7 of 252Not in the top three
Channelscaler7 of 250Not in the top three
ZINFI7 of 250Not in the top three
impact.com7 of 250Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Crossbeam. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 25 answers that named Crossbeam and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com2
gartner.com2
guideflow.com2
learn.g2.com2
monday.com2
partnerplace.io2
partnerstack.com2
abmatic.ai1
articsledge.com1
b2bsaasreviews.com1

Seventeen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming Crossbeam came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Crossbeam

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Crossbeam; a claim can dispute any of them.
Reveal 3
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Crossbeam's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Crossbeam, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at crossbeam.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack