GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Google Workspace · September 2026 Edition

Google · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Google Workspace

6Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Google Workspace was named 2 times in CRM and 1 other category, where HubSpot CRM led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market44 of 71

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In crm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Workspace for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CRM	Revenue operations	0%	44 of 71	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot CRM at 41%
Proposal software	Revenue operations	0%	37 of 79	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 49%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Workspace yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Workspace across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Google Workspace offers an affordable solution with exceptional functionality” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Proposals · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Workspace, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Workspace was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PandaDoc3 of 62Not in the top three

Better Proposals2 of 61Not in the top three

Canva2 of 60Not in the top three

Mailchimp2 of 60Not in the top three

Pipedrive2 of 60Not in the top three

PowerPoint2 of 60Not in the top three

Proposify2 of 60Not in the top three

DocHipo1 of 61Not in the top three

Dock1 of 61Not in the top three

HubSpot Content Hub1 of 61Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Workspace. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 6 answers that named Google Workspace and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

autogenai.com1

betterproposals.io1

ce.smart-it.com1

crowjack.com1

dochipo.com1

flowcase.com1

guideflow.com1

gurussolutions.com1

hubspot.com1

impactplus.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Google Workspace came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

autogenai.com/blog/best-proposal-management-software1

betterproposals.io/blog/proposal-management-software1

ce.smart-it.com/en/blog-post/best-crm-systems-ranking-20261

crowjack.com/10-best-crm-software-20261

dochipo.com/best-software-for-proposals1

dochipo.com/proposal-software-for-small-businesses1

flowcase.com/blog/top-10-proposal-management-software-for-small-businesses-20261

guideflow.com/blog/best-crm-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Google Search is the company behind Google Workspace.

Website: google.com
Headquarters: United States
Founded: 1997

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Workspace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Workspace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.