AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Eventbrite · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Eventbrite

152Judge labels
15First choices
70Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in Event management for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 81 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 39% of its 54 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Eventbrite →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In event management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Eventbrite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Event management platformsMarketing14%3 of 8139%54criticized challenger
Webinar and virtual event platformsMarketing0%67 of 67100%3under 10 labels · led by Livestorm at 25%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Event lead capture appsMarketing0%63 of 7050%2under 10 labels · led by Blinq at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Eventbrite yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Eventbrite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502114
GPT-5.4 mini20013
Gemini 3.5 Flash00055
Perplexity Sonar02013
Grok 4.2011035
Mistral Small10214
DeepSeek V4 Flash02136
Llama 4 Maverick11204
Qwen 3.7 Flash02215
Kimi K220013
GLM 4.7 FlashX10135
MiniMax M2.502114
GPT-6 Luna02024
Muse Glimmer 30B11024

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels2
Paraphrase20 labels1
Comparative31 labels15not counted in share
Budget-constrained32 labels12
Scale-constrained12 labelsNone
Negative43 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative152 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 30 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Eventbrite if you're hosting free events or want maximum exposure through their marketplace.” Kimi K2 · Event management · budget prompt · first choice
“Eventbrite stands out as the best event management platform for companies with a limited budget.” Grok 4.20 · Event management · budget prompt · first choice
“Most often cited as the practical choice for teams with limited implementation time and budget.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Event management · budget prompt · first choice
“The best event management platform for a company with a limited budget is Eventbrite.” Llama 4 Maverick · Event management · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid if: You are selling tickets under $25 (too expensive), selling high-end corporate tickets (no fee cap), or want exclusive ownership of your attendee database.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Event management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid or be extremely cautious with: - Eventbrite if you need reliable support, customization, or are concerned about fee increases post-acquisition” Kimi K2 · Event management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Eventbrite is the platform most frequently cited in complaint compilations for ticket-fee opacity and attendee data ownership.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Event management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Eventbrite has significant red flags... offers almost no help when problems arise. The fees eat into revenue significantly.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Event management · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Eventbrite, over the 152 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Eventbrite was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Whova69 of 1522Not among the top eight
vFairs29 of 1521Not among the top eight
RingCentral Events27 of 1520Not among the top eight
Luma18 of 1527Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Eventbrite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 144 of the 152 answers that named Eventbrite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com88
bizzabo.com84
capterra.com64
eventify.io61
g2.com59
resources.rework.com59
zoho.com48
eventzilla.net42
softwareadvice.com34
eventbrite.comYour site33

539 of the 572 domain citations in answers naming Eventbrite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

eventbrite.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Eventbrite takes 14% of first choices and Bizzabo takes 28%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “event management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best event management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
673,000 a month (“eventbrite”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4,192 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 11,231,792 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,356,271 · 145,829 in the top three
Sites linking to it
603,120
Paid Google search
6 searches its ads show for, about 406 clicks and $483 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
25+ ads · 25 video · 25 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2026, as Revived Soldiers Ukraine, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 25 in the year. 95 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
14%
rank 3 of 81 in event management
Segment leader
28%
Bizzabo
First choices
15 across its categories
Named in
152 answers
Its own site cited
in 144 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on eventbrite.com
10,062
subdomains included
Content
3,391
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog2,11112026-07-24SEO, CRM
News or press552142026-09-09
Glossary or explainer28102024-12-11SEO
Conference or event21202026-06-18SEO
Webinar or virtual event10122026-07-24SEO
Report or ebook6202025-03-18
Case study4002026-03-11
Template or tool2002025-07-08
Podcast or video702022-06-23
Comparison502015-12-29
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page eventbrite.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (10); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Eventbrite

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Eventbrite; a claim can dispute any of them.
Eventbrite Pro 1

Follow Eventbrite

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Eventbrite is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Discover the Best Local Events & Things to Do
For
event organizers
Price stated
Pricing eventbrite.com
Customers named
Sierra NevadaLadies Get PaidKlaviyoNashville Fashion WeekSmart HustleSensorioFitter & FasterUnrig Summit
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Eventbrite's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: eventbrite.com, trust.eventbrite.com, eventbrite.com/blog/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Eventbrite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Eventbrite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Eventbrite by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Eventbrite is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Eventbrite, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at eventbrite.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Eventbrite is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Eventbrite is among the products AI models recommend first in Event management platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Event management platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/event-management-platforms/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/eventbrite--event-management-platforms-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Event management platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Event management platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Event management platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/event-management-platforms/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/eventbrite--event-management-platforms-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Event management platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Event management platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Event management platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://gtm-ai-index.com/marketing/event-management-platforms/"><img src="https://gtm-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/eventbrite--event-management-platforms-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Event management platforms, October 2026 Edition, GTM AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Event management platforms standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.