AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Eventzilla · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Eventzilla

40Judge labels
6First choices
5Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Event management for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 81 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Eventzilla →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In event management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Eventzilla for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Event management platformsMarketing4%8 of 817%15accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Eventzilla yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Eventzilla across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX01203
MiniMax M2.520103
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B02002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels2
Paraphrase6 labels3
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative5 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative40 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Eventzilla offers the best balance of features, flexibility, and affordability for most mid-market B2B companies.” MiniMax M2.5 · Event management · direct prompt · first choice
“Top pick for a mid‑sized B2B company: Eventzilla” MiniMax M2.5 · Event management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Eventzilla is called out specifically as Best event management software for mid-market businesses and non-profits” Muse Glimmer 30B · Event management · direct prompt · alternative
“Eventzilla or Sched are also strong low-cost options” GPT-5.4 mini · Event management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Scales poorly for 10+ events/year | Eventzilla” Grok 4.1 Fast · Event management · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Eventzilla, over the 40 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Eventzilla was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Whova15 of 400Not among the top eight
RSVPify5 of 401Not among the top eight
RegFox4 of 401Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Eventzilla. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 40 answers that named Eventzilla and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eventzilla.netYour site27
bizzabo.com26
resources.rework.com22
mailmodo.com18
capterra.com17
learn.g2.com16
eventify.io15
zoho.com14
moldstud.com12
g2.com11

151 of the 178 domain citations in answers naming Eventzilla came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

eventzilla.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Eventzilla takes 4% of first choices and Bizzabo takes 28%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “event management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best event management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
880 a month (“eventzilla”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
3 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 6,888 a month
Searches its site ranks for
4,766 · 124 in the top three
Sites linking to it
8,779
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
1 ads · 1 image · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2026, as Skanwear Clothing Company, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 1 in the year. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 8 of 81 in event management
Segment leader
28%
Bizzabo
First choices
6 across its categories
Named in
40 answers
Its own site cited
in 39 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on eventzilla.net
767
subdomains included
Content
117
counted in the table below
Documentation
271
Product · Integration
140 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Webinar or virtual event4702024-11-14
Conference or event3002024-11-07
Blog2922026-10-01
Comparison902024-11-14
Glossary or explainer1undated
News or press102025-03-25
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page eventzilla.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Eventzilla

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Eventzilla is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
All-in-One Event Management Platform
For
event planners
Price stated
Basic $1.50 per registration; Pro 1.9% + $1.50 per registration; Plus 2.9% + $1.50 per registration; Annual pricing starts at $1,999/year; Event Hub $0.99 per registered attendee; Self Service Kiosk $0.49 per registered attendee; Lead Capture From $0.30 per registered attendee; Premium features for free events From $49.00 per month eventzilla.net/pricing
Starting price
$1.50 eventzilla.net/pricing
Free plan or trial
Launch Your Event - It's Free! No credit card required eventzilla.net
Integrations claimed
5000 eventzilla.net/pricing · 500 eventzilla.net/platform/integrations pages disagree
Certifications
ISO 27001SOC 1SOC 2 (Type II)PCI DSS
Hosting
multiple US regions
Not stated on the pages read
Customers

What Eventzilla's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: eventzilla.net, eventzilla.net/pricing, eventzilla.net/security, eventzilla.net/platform, eventzilla.net/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Eventzilla's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Eventzilla, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Eventzilla by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Eventzilla is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Eventzilla, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at eventzilla.net is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.