AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › RSVPify · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

RSVPify

20Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Event management for small business buyers
Rank 9 of 81 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In event management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named RSVPify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Event management platformsMarketing2%9 of 810%9under 10 labels · led by Bizzabo at 28%
Event lead capture appsMarketing0%43 of 700%1under 10 labels · led by Blinq at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for RSVPify yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated RSVPify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510102
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels2
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“starting with a free tier option like Eventleaf or RSVPify allows you to test the platform before committing financially” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Event management · budget prompt · first choice
“RSVPify: Free for free events; great for registrations, check-ins, seating charts, and analytics.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Event management · budget prompt · alternative
“Choose RSVPify if you want the easiest setup and better per-ticket pricing for paid events.” Kimi K2 · Event management · budget prompt · alternative
“RSVPify's free plan supports up to 100 RSVPs per month.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Event management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as RSVPify, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RSVPify was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Eventbrite18 of 207Not among the top eight
Cvent Event Marketing & Management10 of 202Not among the top eight
Ticket Tailor8 of 205Not among the top eight
Bizzabo8 of 201Not among the top eight
Whova8 of 201Not among the top eight
Luma6 of 202Not among the top eight
Zoho Backstage6 of 200Not among the top eight
Eventzilla5 of 200Not among the top eight
Google Forms5 of 200Not among the top eight
Swoogo4 of 201Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RSVPify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named RSVPify and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

capterra.com12
eventify.io11
bizzabo.com9
g2.com9
learn.g2.com9
eventee.com7
eventzilla.net6
resources.rework.com6
softwareadvice.com6
whova.com6

Eighty-one of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming RSVPify came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

rsvpify.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RSVPify takes 2% of first choices and Bizzabo takes 28%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “event management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best event management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
22,200 a month (“rsvpify”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
100 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 99,488 a month
Searches its site ranks for
7,019 · 572 in the top three
Sites linking to it
10,497
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
117+ ads · 102 text, 9 image, 6 video · 85 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2022, as RSVPify Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 86 in the year, 31 before. 3 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 9 of 81 in event management
Segment leader
28%
Bizzabo
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
20 answers
Its own site cited
in 20 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on rsvpify.com
965
subdomains included
Content
282
counted in the table below
Documentation
139
Product · Integration
0 · 35
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog217undated
Comparison25undated
Case study12undated
Conference or event10undated
Template or tool7undated
Webinar or virtual event3undated
Report or ebook3undated
Glossary or explainer3undated
News or press2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page rsvpify.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow RSVPify

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RSVPify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RSVPify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RSVPify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where RSVPify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name RSVPify, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at rsvpify.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.