Every category where a model named RingCentral Events for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Webinar and virtual event platforms	Marketing	0%	21 of 67	28%	29	criticized challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Contact center platforms	Customer	0%	20 of 86	15%	13	accepted challenger
Event management platforms	Marketing	0%	16 of 81	17%	12	accepted challenger
Sales dialers and calling	Sales	0%	30 of 75	27%	11	criticized challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Conversational intelligence and call recording	Sales	0%	23 of 91	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 41%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Call tracking platforms	Marketing	0%	46 of 63	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by CallRail at 43%
Contact center quality assurance	Customer	0%	51 of 81	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by EvaluAgent at 28%
In-app messaging and customer communications	Customer	0%	56 of 105	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 21%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, RingCentral Events held within the floor in all eight categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Webinars · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 36 of 51

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 22 → 19 of 63

Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 of 44, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Webinars	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 22 → 21 of 67
Contact center	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 20 of 86, unchanged
Event management	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 16 of 81, unchanged
Dialers	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 72 → 30 of 75
Conversation intel	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 66 → 23 of 91
Call tracking	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 46 of 63, unchanged
Contact center QA	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 51 of 81, unchanged
In-app messaging	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 56 of 105, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated RingCentral Events across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	1	1	4
GPT-5.4 mini	1	2	1	1	5
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	2	1	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	4	2	2	8
Mistral Small	0	2	2	0	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	4	1	7
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	4	1	6
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	5	3	3	11
Kimi K2	0	3	2	1	6
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	2	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	1	0	3
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	2	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	2	1	2	5

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct21 labels1

Paraphrase17 labels1

Comparative57 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained19 labels4

Scale-constrained33 labels1

Negative46 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative193 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“RingCentral is a stronger fit when you want a full event environment, not just a broadcast or webinar room.” GPT-5.4 mini · Webinars · comparative prompt · first choice

“If you need a full virtual conference with networking and a branded event floor: Hopin is the leading choice.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Webinars · direct prompt · alternative

“Zoom Contact Center or RingCentral can be compelling, especially if you want tighter UCaaS/CCaaS bundling” GPT-5.4 mini · Contact center · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for Large-Scale, Multi-Track Virtual Conferences: RingCentral Events *(formerly Hopin)* or vFairs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Webinars · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Hopin collapsed financially after the pandemic boom, laid off over half its staff... This volatility raised concerns about the long-term roadmap” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Event management · negative prompt · hard negative

“"What I'd avoid for predictable cost at scale- Aircall, JustCall, CloudTalk, RingCentral"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Dialers · negative prompt · hard negative

“Post-pandemic decline: The platform has reportedly declined in quality and focus” Kimi K2 · Webinars · negative prompt · hard negative

“Do not buy any legacy packages branded as "Hopin."” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Webinars · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as RingCentral Events, over the 188 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RingCentral Events was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zoom Webinars61 of 1889Not among the top eight

Aircall43 of 1888Not among the top eight

Bizzabo41 of 1886Not among the top eight

Five940 of 1887Not among the top eight

vFairs35 of 1881Not among the top eight

Livestorm33 of 1889Not among the top eight

ON2433 of 1880Not among the top eight

CloudTalk32 of 1886Not among the top eight

GoTo Webinar30 of 1884Not among the top eight

Demio28 of 1887Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RingCentral Events. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 166 of the 188 answers that named RingCentral Events and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com61

cloudtalk.io51

g2.com51

justcall.io39

nextiva.com33

bizzabo.com32

guideflow.com32

easywebinar.com29

livestorm.co28

zoom.com27

383 of the 383 domain citations in answers naming RingCentral Events came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

livestorm.co/free-webinar-software25

learn.g2.com/best-virtual-event-platforms23

learn.g2.com/best-event-management-platforms20

justcall.io/blog/best-sales-dialer-software.html19

whova.com/blog/best-webinar-platforms17

easywebinar.com/blog/webinar-platform-reviews16

remo.co/blog/best-webinar-platforms16

easywebinar.com/blog/best-virtual-event-software14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

ringcentral.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, RingCentral Events takes 0% of first choices and Livestorm takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “webinar and virtual event platform”

Position for “best webinar and virtual event platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 390 a month (“ringcentral events”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 3 a month
Its company's site: ringcentral.com shared with RingCentral's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site: about 9,737,061 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 50,036 · 7,365 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 28,303
Paid Google search: 10 searches its ads show for, about 86 clicks and $3,711 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 56 text, 54 video, 10 image · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2022, as Ringcentral Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 104 in the year, 16 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 21 of 67 in webinars

Segment leader

25%

Livestorm

First choices: 7 across its categories
Named in: 188 answers
Its own site cited: in 166 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as RingCentral Events

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as RingCentral Events; a claim can dispute any of them.

RingCentral 27Hopin 16RingCentral Events (formerly Hopin) 4Hopin (now RingCentral Events) 3Hopin (Now RingCentral Events) 1Hopin (now part of RingCentral Events) 1RingCentral (RingCX) 1RingCentral Events / Hopin 1RingCentral Events / Webex Events 1Ringcentral 1

Follow RingCentral Events

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

RingCentral is the company behind RingCentral Events.

ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Website: ringcentral.com
Headquarters: Belmont, United States
Founded: 2003
Ownership: Public, RNG on New York Stock Exchange
Also from RingCentral: RingCentral Contact Center, RingCentral Engage Voice, RingCentral MVP, RingCentral RingCX

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-powered video and event experiences
ringcentral.com
For: community
ringcentral.com/pricing/video.html
Price stated: Starts at $99 $119 /organizer/month paid annually ringcentral.com/pricing/video.html
Starting price: $99 ringcentral.com/pricing/video.html
Free plan or trial: Try free ringcentral.com/pricing/video.html
Integrations claimed: 45 ringcentral.com/pricing/video.html
Certifications: GDPRHIPAAFINRA
Customers named: SWARM Community
Not stated on the pages read: Hosting

What RingCentral Events's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ringcentral.com, ringcentral.com/pricing/video.html, trust.ringcentral.com, ringcentral.com/solutions/startups, ringcentral.com/us/en/blog/category/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RingCentral Events's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RingCentral Events, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RingCentral Events by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where RingCentral Events is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name RingCentral Events, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.