Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 46 → 5 of 51
GoTo · 1 category · RankedGoTo Webinar
102Judge labels
8First choices
41Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Webinars for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 67 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 26% of its 43 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of GoTo Webinar →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business5 of 52
3%34 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market5 of 67
8%43 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise11 of 51
2%24 labels
criticized challenger
In webinars · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named GoTo Webinar for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar and virtual event platforms | Marketing | 8% | 5 of 67 | 26% | 43 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, GoTo Webinar held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Webinars · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 4 of 63
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 34 → 11 of 44
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | 7% | 9% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 5 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated GoTo Webinar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated GoTo Webinar across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels3
Paraphrase17 labels4
Comparative22 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels1
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative32 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative102 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with Demio if you prioritize modern UX and lead gen, or GoTo Webinar if you need proven reliability at scale.” Kimi K2 · Webinars · direct prompt · first choice
“GoTo Webinar is the stronger operational choice for mid-to-large B2B teams” Perplexity Sonar · Webinars · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“GoToWebinar and Livestorm stand out as top choices” Mistral Small · Webinars · direct prompt · first choice
“Often the best overall for mid-market B2B reliability.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Webinars · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Caution Level: High (For stability and cost)... frequently criticized for failing to keep up with modern needs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Webinars · negative prompt · hard negative
“Hidden costs: Quote-only pricing for "Complete" tier, onboarding fees, and attendee overage charges not listed upfront” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Webinars · negative prompt · soft negative
“"reliable broadcasters" but criticized for no-download limits, poor funnels/analytics, or needing extra tools” Grok 4.1 Fast · Webinars · negative prompt · soft negative
“GoTo Webinar: Reliability issues at scale, dropped users, audio/video lag, and hard-to-reach support” MiniMax M2.5 · Webinars · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GoTo Webinar, over the 102 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GoTo Webinar was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GoTo Webinar, over the 102 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GoTo Webinar was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GoTo Webinar. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 96 of the 102 answers that named GoTo Webinar and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
easywebinar.com79
livestorm.co64
whova.com44
learn.g2.com42
remo.co35
g2.com34
zoom.com33
webinarninja.com32
airmeet.com31
bizzabo.com28
422 of the 422 domain citations in answers naming GoTo Webinar came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
goto.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, GoTo Webinar takes 8% of first choices and Livestorm takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
goto.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, GoTo Webinar takes 8% of first choices and Livestorm takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “webinar and virtual event platform”
8
Position for “best webinar and virtual event platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“goto webinar”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 199 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 503,681 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 41,663 · 3,369 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 32,163
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 14 clicks and $549 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 5 of 67 in webinars
Segment leader
25%
Livestorm
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 102 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 96 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on goto.com
5,024
subdomains included
Content
1,641
counted in the table below
Documentation
4
Product · Integration
57 · 97
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,037 | 8 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 227 | 1 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 157 | 0 | 2025-08-21 | ||
| Case study | 148 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 25 | 0 | 2026-03-17 | ||
| Comparison | 22 | 0 | 2025-06-26 | ||
| Report or ebook | 13 | 0 | 2020-10-07 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | 0 | 2020-07-21 | ||
| Podcast or video | 4 | 0 | 2023-08-08 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Goto connect athenaone ai scheduling blog
- 2026-09-15Pulse of work 2026 2 blog
- 2026-09-15Top ai receptionist use cases by industry blog
- 2026-09-14Best ai voice receptionist prompt blog
- 2026-09-10What is an ai receptionist glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-08Healthcare front desk day in the life chapter two blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- March 9, 2026 to March 12, 2026HIMSS 2026Venetian Convention & Expo Center, Las Vegas, United States · attended
As the event pages on goto.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page goto.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as GoTo Webinar
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as GoTo Webinar; a claim can dispute any of them.
GoToWebinar 15GoTo Webinar / Webex 1GoToWebinar (GoTo) 1GoToWebinar (LogMeIn) 1GoToWebinar (or GoTo Connect Events) 1GoToWebinar Lite 1
Follow GoTo Webinar
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
GoTo is the company behind GoTo Webinar.ShowHide
The company
GoTo is the company behind GoTo Webinar.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- goto.com
- Headquarters
- Boston, United States
- Founded
- 2003
- Ownership
- Public on Nasdaq
- Also from GoTo
- GoTo Connect
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- All-in-one webinar software
- For
- sales and marketing
- Free plan or trial
- Try Free goto.com
- Customers named
- KSV1870ACP Holding Austria GmbHLSZGiractDATAflorThe Executive InstituteXING EventsSage
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What GoTo Webinar's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: goto.com, goto.com/pricing/connect, goto.com/company/trust, goto.com/solutions/retail, goto.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GoTo Webinar's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GoTo Webinar, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for GoTo Webinar by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where GoTo Webinar is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name GoTo Webinar, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.