Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 11 of 51
1 category · RankedWebinarJam
64Judge labels
3First choices
36Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Webinars for mid-market buyers
Rank 10 of 67 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 52% of its 25 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of WebinarJam →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 52
2%28 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market10 of 67
3%25 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise51 of 51
0%10 labels
criticized challenger
In webinars · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named WebinarJam for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar and virtual event platforms | Marketing | 3% | 10 of 67 | 52% | 25 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, WebinarJam held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Webinars · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 50 → 18 of 63
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 52 → 44 of 44
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 50 → 10 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated WebinarJam across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated WebinarJam across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labels1
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels2
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative37 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative64 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best webinar and virtual event platform for a company with a limited budget is WebinarJam.” Llama 4 Maverick · Webinars · budget prompt · first choice
“Best budget pick for regular webinars: WebinarJam Starter” GPT-6 Luna · Webinars · budget prompt · first choice
“For webinars specifically, consider platforms like Livestorm, Zoom Webinars, ON24, and WebinarJam” Llama 4 Maverick · Webinars · scale prompt · alternative
“Best for: Budget-conscious creators running evergreen or automated webinars” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Webinars · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Contains high or critical access control vulnerabilities (research showed attackers could easily become a host)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Webinars · negative prompt · hard negative
“these simulated webinars can feel highly deceptive to audiences, which can damage your brand's trust” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Webinars · negative prompt · hard negative
“WebinarJam holds notoriously low customer service scores (often hovering around 1.5/5 stars)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Webinars · negative prompt · hard negative
“frequently cited for consistent patterns of failure and are considered to have hidden costs” Mistral Small · Webinars · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WebinarJam, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WebinarJam was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as WebinarJam, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WebinarJam was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WebinarJam. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 51 of the 52 answers that named WebinarJam and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
easywebinar.com42
livestorm.co33
g2.com25
learn.g2.com23
remo.co18
whova.com15
ewebinar.com14
webinarninja.com14
airmeet.com12
guideflow.com12
208 of the 208 domain citations in answers naming WebinarJam came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
webinarjam.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, WebinarJam takes 3% of first choices and Livestorm takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
webinarjam.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, WebinarJam takes 3% of first choices and Livestorm takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “webinar and virtual event platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best webinar and virtual event platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“webinarjam”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 87 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,043 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 385 · 37 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 13,723
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
3%
rank 10 of 67 in webinars
Segment leader
25%
Livestorm
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 52 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 51 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on webinarjam.com
331
subdomains included
Content
244
counted in the table below
Documentation
52
Product · Integration
0 · 2
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar or virtual event | 219 | 40 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Blog | 16 | 0 | 2024-01-12 | ||
| Comparison | 9 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Webinar conversion mistakes webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-22Webinars for speakers webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-18How to create webinar slides webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-04How to repurpose a webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-31Webinar invitation subject line webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-2815369997 create autoresponder automation rules for your webinar webinar or virtual event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page webinarjam.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as WebinarJam
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as WebinarJam; a claim can dispute any of them.
EverWebinar 5WebinarJam / EverWebinar 2WebinarJam & EverWebinar 1WebinarJam Starter 1
Follow WebinarJam
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
WebinarJam is its own company.ShowHide
The company
WebinarJam is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Live & Automated Webinar Software That Converts
- For
- businesses, coaches, experts, and creators who host webinars and sell online
- Price stated
- free webinarjam.com/partners
- Free plan or trial
- the affiliate application — it’s free and only takes two minutes webinarjam.com/partners
- Integrations claimed
- 5000 webinarjam.com
- Customers named
- Roman HruskaTakuhiro & YukiKevin Fernando
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, certifications, hosting
What WebinarJam's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: webinarjam.com, webinarjam.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WebinarJam's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WebinarJam, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WebinarJam by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where WebinarJam is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name WebinarJam, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.