| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar and virtual event platforms | Marketing | 3% | 9 of 67 | 25% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Livestorm at 25% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer education and LMS | Customer | 0% | 83 of 86 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by LearnUpon at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | 2% | 4% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 9 of 67 |
| Customer education | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 42 → 83 of 86 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best value pick... EasyWebinar is the standout affordable option.” Kimi K2 · Webinars · budget prompt · first choice
“Zoho Meeting or EasyWebinar represent the best bang for your buck” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Webinars · budget prompt · first choice
“EasyWebinar - Strong for sales webinars and evergreen content” Kimi K2 · Webinars · negative prompt · first choice
“EasyWebinar Standard at $78/mo is the only sub-$100 option that includes evergreen automation and a native CRM” Muse Glimmer 30B · Webinars · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Caution Level: High (For bugginess and support)... a significant minority report severe technical issues” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Webinars · negative prompt · hard negative
“explicitly noted as a skip if your program is purely a self-paced course library with formal certification tracking” Muse Glimmer 30B · Customer education · negative prompt · soft negative
“Some platforms (e.g., EasyWebinar-adjacent tools) limit setups, frustrating automation-heavy users.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Customer education · negative prompt · soft negative
“but it is generally pricier than ClickMeeting or Zoho” Perplexity Sonar · Webinars · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 32 answers that named EasyWebinar and are not a share of its labels.
105 of the 137 domain citations in answers naming EasyWebinar came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar or virtual event | 396 | 4 | 2026-09-26 | CRM, SEO | |
| Blog | 73 | undated | CRM, Customer education | ||
| Case study | 11 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 8 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Every page easywebinar.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What EasyWebinar's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: easywebinar.com, easywebinar.com/case-studies, easywebinar.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EasyWebinar's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EasyWebinar, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for EasyWebinar by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: