Livestorm

Named in 20 judge labels across 1 category by 6 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 4 first choices, 0 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

15% in Webinars

Rank 2 of 41 products named in webinar and virtual event platforms, accepted challenger. 0 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 20 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Livestorm. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Webinar and virtual event platforms	Marketing	15%	2 of 41	0%	20	accepted challenger

By model

How each model treated Livestorm across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Opus 5	1	2	0	3
Claude Opus 4.8	0	3	0	3
GPT-6 Astra	0	2	0	2
GPT-5.6 Sol	0	3	0	3
Gemini 3.1 Pro	2	2	1	5
Perplexity Sonar Pro	3	1	0	4

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Livestorm if your priority is GDPR compliance, EU data hosting... (Highly recommended given your location)” Gemini 3.1 Pro · Webinars · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“the best overall choice is usually Livestorm if you want a strong mix of features and a free plan” Perplexity Sonar Pro · Webinars · budget prompt · first choice

“1. Livestorm * Best for: Browser-based ease of use and marketing demand generation.” Gemini 3.1 Pro · Webinars · comparative prompt · first choice

“Choose Livestorm if you want an easy browser-based experience with strong automation.” Perplexity Sonar Pro · Webinars · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Names read as Livestorm

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Livestorm; a claim can dispute any of them.

Every label used the canonical name.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Livestorm, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.