AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Webinars › Livestorm vs WebinarJam
Webinar and virtual event platforms · October 2026 Edition

Livestorm vs WebinarJam

Six of fourteen models named Livestorm first on the direct prompt; zero named WebinarJam. Livestorm was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and WebinarJam by thirteen and Livestorm carries 52 labels and WebinarJam 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Livestorm

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

WebinarJam

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share25%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%52%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#8A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels5225A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Livestorm reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Zoom Webinars was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Livestorm vs Demio · Livestorm vs Zoom Webinars · Livestorm vs Goldcast

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the webinar and virtual event platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LivestormFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWebinarJam
Direct60
Paraphrase60
Comparative10
Budget-constrained222 against Livestorm · 1 against WebinarJam
Scale-constrained10
Negative2010 against WebinarJam
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Livestorm and WebinarJam were named in the same answer thirty-five times, of the 139 answers naming Livestorm and the 52 naming WebinarJam. In those answers WebinarJam took the first choice two times and Livestorm twelve.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Livestorm and WebinarJam stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Livestorm WebinarJam first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Livestorm on the left and WebinarJam on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Livestorm and WebinarJam stood in it.

Livestorm first, WebinarJam not the choice

6 of 14 modelsWebinarJam was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Livestorm alternatives: Demio, GoTo Webinar, Goldcast, Zoom Webinars
Gemini 3.5 FlashLivestorm alternatives: Airmeet, Contrast, Demio, Goldcast
Mistral SmallGoTo Webinar, Livestorm
DeepSeek V4 FlashLivestorm alternatives: Demio, GoTo Webinar, Zoom Webinars
Llama 4 MaverickLivestorm
Muse Glimmer 30BDemio, Livestorm alternatives: Zoom Video Webinars, Zuddl

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Grok 4.1 FastGoTo Webinar alternatives: Demio, Livestorm, ON24, RingCentral Events, Webex Webinars, Zoom Webinars
Qwen 3.7 FlashGoldcast alternatives: Livestorm, Zoom Webinars
Kimi K2Demio, GoTo Webinar alternatives: Livestorm, RingCentral Events, Zoom Webinars

Neither was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniON24 alternatives: Bizzabo, Cvent, Zoom Webinars
Perplexity SonarAirmeet, Demio alternatives: GoTo Webinar
GLM 4.7 FlashXZoom Webinars alternatives: Airmeet, ON24, RingCentral Events, Webex Webinars, WebinarNinja
MiniMax M2.5BigMarker, Goldcast alternatives: RingCentral Events, Zoom Webinars
GPT-6 LunaGoldcast alternatives: ON24, Zoom Webinars

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Livestorm leads by thirty points.
Livestorm32%#1 of 16
WebinarJam2%#10 of 16
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Livestorm leads by twenty-one points.
Livestorm25%#1 of 16
WebinarJam3%#8 of 16
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Livestorm0%#12 of 13
WebinarJam0%#13 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Livestorm

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Platforms like Livestorm charge per attendee, which can get expensive as you grow.” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Quick trials, but caps hit fast” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Livestorm if your priority is a browser-based platform with strong CRM sync and easy team collaboration.” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Platforms like Demio, Livestorm, or WebinarGeek allow presenters and attendees to join with a single click” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Best all-around for B2B marketing teams | Livestorm (browser-based, great engagement tools, scales to 3,000)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about WebinarJam

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Contains high or critical access control vulnerabilities (research showed attackers could easily become a host)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“these simulated webinars can feel highly deceptive to audiences, which can damage your brand's trust” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“WebinarJam holds notoriously low customer service scores (often hovering around 1.5/5 stars)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“The best webinar and virtual event platform for a company with a limited budget is WebinarJam.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Best budget pick for regular webinars: WebinarJam Starter” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
“For webinars specifically, consider platforms like Livestorm, Zoom Webinars, ON24, and WebinarJam” Llama 4 Maverick · scale prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.