Webinar and virtual event platforms · October 2026 Edition
Goldcast vs WebinarJam
Three of fourteen models named Goldcast first on the direct prompt; zero named WebinarJam. Goldcast was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and WebinarJam by thirteen and Goldcast carries 20 labels and WebinarJam 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share10%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%52%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels2025A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Goldcast reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Zoom Webinars was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Livestorm vs Goldcast · Livestorm vs WebinarJam · Demio vs Goldcast
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the webinar and virtual event platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GoldcastFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWebinarJam
Direct30
Paraphrase20
Comparative00
Budget-constrained021 against WebinarJam
Scale-constrained10
Negative001 against Goldcast · 10 against WebinarJam
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Goldcast and WebinarJam stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Goldcast WebinarJam first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Goldcast on the left and WebinarJam on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Goldcast and WebinarJam stood in it.
Goldcast first, WebinarJam not the choice
3 of 14 modelsWebinarJam was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashGoldcast alternatives: Livestorm, Zoom Webinars
MiniMax M2.5BigMarker, Goldcast alternatives: RingCentral Events, Zoom Webinars
GPT-6 LunaGoldcast alternatives: ON24, Zoom Webinars
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Livestorm alternatives: Demio, GoTo Webinar, Goldcast, Zoom Webinars
Gemini 3.5 FlashLivestorm alternatives: Airmeet, Contrast, Demio, Goldcast
Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniON24 alternatives: Bizzabo, Cvent, Zoom Webinars
Perplexity SonarAirmeet, Demio alternatives: GoTo Webinar
Grok 4.1 FastGoTo Webinar alternatives: Demio, Livestorm, ON24, RingCentral Events, Webex Webinars, Zoom Webinars
Mistral SmallGoTo Webinar, Livestorm
DeepSeek V4 FlashLivestorm alternatives: Demio, GoTo Webinar, Zoom Webinars
Llama 4 MaverickLivestorm
Kimi K2Demio, GoTo Webinar alternatives: Livestorm, RingCentral Events, Zoom Webinars
GLM 4.7 FlashXZoom Webinars alternatives: Airmeet, ON24, RingCentral Events, Webex Webinars, WebinarNinja
Muse Glimmer 30BDemio, Livestorm alternatives: Zoom Video Webinars, Zuddl
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Goldcast2%#– of 16WebinarJam2%#10 of 16Mid-marketThe figures above
Goldcast leads by seven points.
Goldcast10%#4 of 16WebinarJam3%#8 of 16Enterprise
What the models said about Goldcast
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“also mentioned with caution, especially regarding pricing and reliability” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Goldcast if your primary goal is to attribute pipeline to your webinars and run sophisticated ABM plays.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about WebinarJam
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Contains high or critical access control vulnerabilities (research showed attackers could easily become a host)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“these simulated webinars can feel highly deceptive to audiences, which can damage your brand's trust” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“WebinarJam holds notoriously low customer service scores (often hovering around 1.5/5 stars)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“The best webinar and virtual event platform for a company with a limited budget is WebinarJam.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Best budget pick for regular webinars: WebinarJam Starter” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
“For webinars specifically, consider platforms like Livestorm, Zoom Webinars, ON24, and WebinarJam” Llama 4 Maverick · scale prompt · alternative
Also compared
Livestorm vs GoldcastLivestorm vs WebinarJamDemio vs GoldcastDemio vs WebinarJamZoom Webinars vs GoldcastZoom Webinars vs WebinarJamGoldcast vs GoTo WebinarGoldcast vs Zoho WebinarGoldcast vs AirmeetGoTo Webinar vs WebinarJamZoho Webinar vs WebinarJamAirmeet vs WebinarJamAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full webinars standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.