Webinar and virtual event platforms · September 2026 Edition
Livestorm vs Demio
Two of twelve models named Livestorm first on the direct prompt; four named Demio. Both were named by all twelve models and both carry 47 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share23%20%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%13%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 19; printed, not drawn.
Labels4747Equal, which is what makes the shares comparable.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Livestorm reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Goldcast was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. Livestorm vs Goldcast · Demio vs Goldcast
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the webinar and virtual event platforms page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LivestormFirst choices, of twelve modelsDemio
Direct24
Paraphrase44
Comparative10
Budget-constrained304 against Livestorm · 2 against Demio
Scale-constrained11
Negative204 against Demio
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Livestorm and Demio stood in it.
Both were the first choice
1 of 12 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.Kimi K2Demio, Livestorm alternatives: BigMarker, Goldcast
Livestorm first, Demio an alternative
1 of 12 modelsDemio was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.DeepSeek V4 FlashLivestorm alternatives: Demio, Goldcast
Demio first, Livestorm an alternative
3 of 12 modelsLivestorm was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniDemio alternatives: ON24
Grok 4.1 FastDemio alternatives: GoTo Webinar, Goldcast, Livestorm, ON24, Zoom Webinars
MiniMax M2.5Demio alternatives: Bizzabo, Goldcast, Livestorm
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5BigMarker alternatives: Demio, GoTo Webinar, Goldcast, Livestorm
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoldcast alternatives: Airmeet, Demio, Livestorm
Perplexity SonarGoldcast alternatives: Bizzabo, GoTo Webinar, Livestorm
Mistral SmallGoldcast alternatives: Demio, Livestorm, Zoom Webinars
Qwen 3.7 FlashGoldcast alternatives: Livestorm, ON24, Zoom Webinars
GLM 4.7 FlashXGoTo Webinar alternatives: Airmeet, ClickMeeting, Cvent, Demio, EventMobi, PheedLoop, WebinarJam, Whova, Zoom Webinars, Zuddl
Neither was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Demio leads by twenty-six points.
Demio39%#1 of 16Livestorm13%#2 of 16Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Livestorm leads at mid-market.
Livestorm23%#1 of 19Demio20%#2 of 19Enterprise
The order flips: Demio leads at enterprise.
Demio2%#10 of 16Livestorm0%#14 of 16What the models said about Livestorm
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Better for marketing automation and more polished event workflows, but usually pricier: Livestorm” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“significantly cheaper than premium options like Livestorm (which starts around $79–$99/month)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“price per attendee, which can get expensive as you scale” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Recommended Alternatives with Better Reputations: Livestorm (browser-based, strong security certifications, GDPR-compliant)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“B2B lead-gen focused → prioritize CRM depth + attribution: Livestorm, Demio, GoToWebinar, or Airmeet.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Around B2B Choice: Livestorm ... currently handles this workflow better than any other competitor.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Demio
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Platforms with poor reliability scores (Demio, BrightTALK)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Most webinar platforms (like GoToWebinar or Demio) use tiered pricing, meaning the more people register for your webinars, the more you have to pay.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“attractive interface, but reported audio/connection issues, tricky HubSpot integration, and data export lockout after cancellation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with Demio if budget is a consideration, or Goldcast if webinar quality and brand presentation are critical” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with WebinarGeek or Demio as they offer the best balance of features, pricing, and ease of use” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Demio for its balance of affordability, ROI tracking, and ease of use” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.