Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 51 → 22 of 51
2 categories · RankedBigMarker
42Judge labels
2First choices
8Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Webinars for mid-market buyers
Rank 11 of 67 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 22 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of BigMarker →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business23 of 52
0%10 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market11 of 67
2%22 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise8 of 51
2%9 labels
under the label threshold
In webinars · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named BigMarker for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar and virtual event platforms | Marketing | 2% | 11 of 67 | 18% | 22 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Event management platforms | Marketing | 0% | 34 of 81 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Bizzabo at 28% |
Movement
Since September 2026, BigMarker held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Webinars · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 → 10 of 63
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 8 of 44
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinars | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 11 of 67 |
| Event management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 34 of 81, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated BigMarker across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated BigMarker across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels1
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Goldcast or BigMarker would be the strongest choices” MiniMax M2.5 · Webinars · direct prompt · first choice
“Consider BigMarker if you need deep customization/white-labeling for premium branded events.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Webinars · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“BigMarker or Zoom Events currently hold better stability and integration profiles” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Event management · negative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Marketing teams running multi-session summits and automated webinar funnels” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Webinars · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“more suited for larger or more complex events, but may be overkill for a typical mid-market B2B company” Mistral Small · Webinars · direct prompt · soft negative
“Caution Level: Medium (For support and pricing)... it is not for beginners or small teams.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Webinars · negative prompt · soft negative
“Setup takes significant time and pricing is opaque” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Webinars · negative prompt · soft negative
“Steep learning curve; pricing not transparent” Kimi K2 · Webinars · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BigMarker, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BigMarker was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BigMarker, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BigMarker was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BigMarker. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 42 answers that named BigMarker and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
easywebinar.com25
livestorm.co25
remo.co20
learn.g2.com19
whova.com19
zoom.com15
bizzabo.com14
viasocket.com13
airmeet.com12
g2.com12
174 of the 174 domain citations in answers naming BigMarker came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
bigmarker.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, BigMarker takes 2% of first choices and Livestorm takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
bigmarker.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, BigMarker takes 2% of first choices and Livestorm takes 25%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “webinar and virtual event platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best webinar and virtual event platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“bigmarker”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 14 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 13,514 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,719 · 98 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 10,852
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 67 in webinars
Segment leader
25%
Livestorm
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 42 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 38 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on bigmarker.com
55
subdomains included
Content
41
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Webinar or virtual event | 16 | undated | CRM | ||
| Blog | 6 | undated | |||
| Case study | 6 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 6 | undated | |||
| News or press | 5 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page bigmarker.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow BigMarker
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
BigMarker.ShowHide
The company
BigMarker.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- bigmarker.com
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Modern, No-Download Webinar Software
- For
- marketers, learning and content managers
- Price stated
- Let's talk... bigmarker.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Yes, we do! Just email us at sales@bigmarker.com and we'd be happy to set you up with a trial or proof of concept. bigmarker.com/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 2PayPal verified merchantAuthorize.net verified merchant
- Customers named
- TEDCanvaAmazon BusinessNorthwestern UniversityPMIThe Wall Street Journal
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting
What BigMarker's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: bigmarker.com, bigmarker.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BigMarker's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BigMarker, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BigMarker by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where BigMarker is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name BigMarker, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.