AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Microsoft Advertising · October 2026 Edition
Microsoft · 5 categories · Ranked

Microsoft Advertising

52Judge labels
3First choices
7Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Paid ads for mid-market buyers
Rank 18 of 121 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Microsoft Advertising →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In retail media · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Microsoft Advertising for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Retail media platformsMarketing2%18 of 1210%2under 10 labels · led by Amazon Ads at 33%
Search and social advertising platformsMarketing2%13 of 11313%15accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Native and content advertisingMarketing0%18 of 860%2under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 41%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Programmatic and display advertisingMarketing0%47 of 920%1under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 48%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Video advertisingMarketing0%70 of 1140%1under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 32%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Microsoft Advertising yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Microsoft Advertising across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini20114
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000202
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01012
Kimi K211002
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.504004
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels1
Paraphrase8 labels1
Comparative13 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative11 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want demand capture: start with Google Ads and Microsoft Advertising.” GPT-5.4 mini · Paid ads · comparative prompt · first choice
“the best all-around choice is usually Microsoft Advertising for paid search” GPT-5.4 mini · Paid ads · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Microsoft Advertising (best cost-efficiency for B2B)” Kimi K2 · Retail media · direct prompt · first choice
“Microsoft Ads is Bing's PPC platform, offering a good alternative to appear in search results” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Paid ads · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Recent user reviews for Microsoft Ads, for example, include complaints about repeated suspensions and billing transparency concerns.” GPT-5.4 mini · Paid ads · negative prompt · soft negative
“though its interface is dated compared to Google's” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paid ads · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Microsoft Advertising, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Microsoft Advertising was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Google Ads33 of 5215Not among the top eight
Meta Ads23 of 527Not among the top eight
LinkedIn Campaign Manager17 of 524Not among the top eight
Marin Software13 of 520Not among the top eight
StackAdapt11 of 524Not among the top eight
Optmyzr11 of 521Not among the top eight
The Trade Desk9 of 524Not among the top eight
Skai9 of 522Not among the top eight
Smartly9 of 521Not among the top eight
Google Display & Video 3607 of 521Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Microsoft Advertising. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 52 answers that named Microsoft Advertising and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com21
blog.hubspot.com16
madgicx.com12
linkedin.com11
worldmetrics.org11
about.ads.microsoft.comYour site10
stackmatix.com10
fueler.io9
get-ryze.ai9
abmatic.ai7

106 of the 116 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Advertising came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Microsoft Advertising stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
14,800 a month (“microsoft advertising”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
65 a month
Its own site
It sits on Microsoft's site (microsoft.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 18 of 121 in retail media
Segment leader
33%
Amazon Ads
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
52 answers
Its own site cited
in 47 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Microsoft Advertising

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Microsoft Advertising; a claim can dispute any of them.
Microsoft Ads 5Microsoft Advertising (Bing) 3Google Ads + Microsoft Ads + LinkedIn Campaign Manager (Direct Platform) 1Microsoft Advertising (Bing Ads) 1Microsoft Advertising (formerly Bing Ads) 1

Follow Microsoft Advertising

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Microsoft is the company behind Microsoft Advertising.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Vancouver, Canada
Founded
1975
Employees
about 228,000 (2024)
Ownership
Public, 4338 on Hong Kong Stock Exchange

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Customers named
InvestecCampari GroupLeatherman Tool Group
Not stated on the pages read
Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Microsoft Advertising's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: microsoft.com/de-de/dynamics-365/solutions/sales-and-marketing, microsoft.com/bg-bg/microsoft-copilot/copilot-101/ai-marketing, microsoft.com/es-es/dynamics-365/solutions/sales-and-marketing, microsoft.com/fi-fi/dynamics-365/solutions/sales-and-marketing, microsoft.com/fr-fr/dynamics-365/solutions/sales-and-marketing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Advertising's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Advertising, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Advertising by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Microsoft Advertising is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Microsoft Advertising, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at microsoft.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.