GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Salesflare · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Salesflare

44Judge labels
6First choices
4Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in CRM for small business buyers
Rank 11 of 71 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In crm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Salesflare for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
CRMRevenue operations2%11 of 710%9under 10 labels · led by HubSpot CRM at 41%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Salesflare yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Salesflare across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small11002
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labels4
Paraphrase13 labels2
Comparative8 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Salesflare - *Best Overall for B2B Sales Teams*” Mistral Small · CRM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“it auto-populates relationships from email/calendar... though intentionally less enterprise-heavy” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CRM · direct prompt · alternative
“Salesflare is also a top pick for small and medium-sized B2B sales teams.” Llama 4 Maverick · CRM · direct prompt · alternative
“Sales-only? Pipedrive or Salesflare (minimal admin).” Grok 4.1 Fast · CRM · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Salesflare, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Salesflare was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Pipedrive40 of 4410Not in the top three
Zoho CRM34 of 440Not in the top three
HubSpot CRM31 of 4415Not in the top three
Freshsales24 of 440Not in the top three
Salesforce Sales Cloud20 of 442Not in the top three
HubSpot Sales Hub13 of 446Not in the top three
EngageBay7 of 440Not in the top three
Less Annoying CRM6 of 440Not in the top three
Bigin by Zoho5 of 440Not in the top three
Nutshell5 of 440Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Salesflare. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 44 answers that named Salesflare and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

croclub.com7
blog.salesflare.comYour site5
fitsmallbusiness.com4
konabayev.com4
pcmag.com4
reddit.com4
techradar.com4
toolradar.com4
zapier.com4
bigcontacts.com3

Thirty-eight of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Salesflare came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesflare's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesflare, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at salesflare.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack