Every category where a model named Traction Complete for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Lead routing and management	Sales	0%	17 of 104	0%	10	accepted challenger
Identity resolution	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	82 of 151	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Traction Complete yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Traction Complete across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	1	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase11 labelsNone

Comparative7 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“prioritize Salesforce-native routing tools (such as *LeanData, Traction Complete, Kubaru,* or *Distribution Engine*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lead routing · negative prompt · first choice

“Choose LeanData or Traction Complete if you have highly complex account ownership logic” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lead routing · comparative prompt · first choice

“Salesforce only → Kubaru or Traction Complete (native and cost-effective)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lead routing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Alternative: Traction Complete (highly comparable for Salesforce)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Identity · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Traction Complete, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Traction Complete was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LeanData31 of 3415Not in the top three

Chili Piper28 of 340Not in the top three

Kubaru18 of 344Not in the top three

LeadAngel16 of 344Not in the top three

Default16 of 341Not in the top three

HubSpot Sales Hub13 of 340Not in the top three

Distribution Engine12 of 341Not in the top three

RevenueHero12 of 341Not in the top three

Salesforce Lead Assignment Rules7 of 340Not in the top three

Calendly6 of 340Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Traction Complete. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 34 answers that named Traction Complete and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com2

knock-ai.com2

kubaru.io2

leadangel.com2

leandata.com2

zeeg.me2

articsledge.com1

cal.com1

croclub.com1

darwinapps.com1

Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Traction Complete came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

kubaru.io/blog/best-salesforce-lead-routing-software2

leadangel.com/blog/abm/best-lead-routing-software2

leandata.com/blog/lead-routing-software-guide2

zeeg.me/en/blog/post/lead-routing-software2

articsledge.com/post/lead-routing-software1

cal.com/blog/lead-routing-software1

croclub.com/tools/best-lead-routing-software1

darwinapps.com/blog/11-best-lead-to-account-matching-tools-for-b2b-saas-in-20261

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Traction Complete's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Traction Complete, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tractioncomplete.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.