Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 15 of 103
1 category · Named, not rankedCalendly Routing
16Judge labels
0First choices
6Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Calendly Routing was named 4 times in Lead routing, where LeadAngel led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business15 of 110
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market89 of 111
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise86 of 87
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In lead routing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Calendly Routing for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 0% | 89 of 111 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Calendly Routing held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Lead routing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 22 → 78 of 103
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 82 → 77 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 89 of 111 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Calendly Routing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Calendly Routing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The simplest scheduling-focused option... offering an easy and budget-friendly way to manage meeting distribution.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Lead routing · budget prompt · alternative
“Calendly is the most cost-effective solution” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lead routing · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“The Standard plan at $10 has no routing at all, and buying the Teams plan expecting Salesforce-aware routing is a common and expensive mistake” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Lead routing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Calendly's routing forms require its most expensive Enterprise plans to support Salesforce account-owner lookups.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lead routing · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Calendly Routing, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Calendly Routing was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Calendly Routing, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Calendly Routing was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Calendly Routing. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Calendly Routing and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
leadangel.com7
leandata.com7
reddit.com7
avoma.com6
default.com6
salesforceben.com6
bigcontacts.com5
snipeoutbound.com5
techrepublic.com5
tomba.io5
Fifty-nine of the fifty-nine domain citations in answers naming Calendly Routing came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
calendly.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Calendly Routing takes 0% of first choices and LeadAngel takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
calendly.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Calendly Routing takes 0% of first choices and LeadAngel takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lead routing and management tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best lead routing and management tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 292,858 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 31,476 · 1,285 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 643,919
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 10 clicks and $34 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 89 of 111 in lead routing
Segment leader
26%
LeadAngel
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 16 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on calendly.com
5,836
subdomains included
Content
642
counted in the table below
Documentation
5,020
Product · Integration
21 · 96
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 276 | 14 | 2026-09-18 | Scheduling, CRM | |
| Report or ebook | 126 | 0 | 2024-03-29 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 69 | 0 | 2024-11-21 | ||
| Case study | 60 | 0 | 2026-05-29 | ||
| News or press | 32 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 28 | 0 | 2025-05-09 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 28 | 1 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Conference or event | 20 | 0 | 2026-06-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2024-11-25 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-18Company and product blog
- 2026-09-18Typeform integration blog
- 2026-09-18Integrations blog
- 2026-09-18Sales and marketing blog
- 2026-09-17Growth and productivity blog
- 2026-09-17Social media integrations blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page calendly.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Calendly Routing
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Calendly Routing; a claim can dispute any of them.
Calendly 3
Follow Calendly Routing
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Calendly is the company behind Calendly Routing.ShowHide
The company
Calendly is the company behind Calendly Routing.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- calendly.com
- Headquarters
- United States
- Founded
- 2013
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Add routing forms to qualify leads and match them with the right team member.
- For
- Information Technology Teams
- Free plan or trial
- No credit card required calendly.com
- Integrations claimed
- 150 calendly.com · 18 calendly.com/solutions/it pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 2 (Type 2)SOC 3CSA STARPCI COMPLIANTISO/IEC 27001
- Customers named
- Alation, Inc.VirtruAgriWebbLyft
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, hosting
What Calendly Routing's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: calendly.com, calendly.com/pricing, calendly.com/security, calendly.com/solutions/it, calendly.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Calendly Routing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Calendly Routing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Calendly Routing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Calendly Routing is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Calendly Routing, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.