AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Sales › Lead routing › HubSpot Sales Hub vs Default
Lead routing and management · October 2026 Edition

HubSpot Sales Hub vs Default

Four of fourteen models named HubSpot Sales Hub first on the direct prompt; one named Default. HubSpot Sales Hub was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Default by nine and HubSpot Sales Hub carries 29 labels and Default 16, so the shares are not directly comparable.

HubSpot Sales Hub

accepted challenger

By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in twenty-two categories this edition.

Default

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share9%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels2916A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, HubSpot Sales Hub reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.LeanData was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. LeadAngel vs HubSpot Sales Hub · LeadAngel vs Default · LeanData vs HubSpot Sales Hub

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the lead routing and management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HubSpot Sales HubFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDefault
Direct41
Paraphrase00
Comparative20
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained10
Negative002 against HubSpot Sales Hub
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where HubSpot Sales Hub and Default stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
HubSpot Sales Hub Default first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, HubSpot Sales Hub on the left and Default on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where HubSpot Sales Hub and Default stood in it.

HubSpot Sales Hub first, Default an alternative

4 of 14 modelsDefault was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.20HubSpot Sales Hub alternatives: Pipedrive, Salesflare, Zoho CRM
DeepSeek V4 FlashHubSpot Sales Hub alternatives: Chili Piper, Default, LeanData
Llama 4 MaverickHubSpot Sales Hub alternatives: Chili Piper, LeadSquared, LeanData
GLM 4.7 FlashXHubSpot Sales Hub alternatives: Chili Piper, LeanData

Default first, HubSpot Sales Hub an alternative

1 of 14 modelsHubSpot Sales Hub was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Muse Glimmer 30BDefault, LeanData alternatives: Chili Piper, HubSpot Sales Hub, Salesforce Sales Cloud

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5LeadAngel, LeanData alternatives: Default, HubSpot Sales Hub
Gemini 3.5 FlashChili Piper, LeanData alternatives: Default, HubSpot Sales Hub, RevenueHero, Traction Complete
Perplexity SonarLeadAngel alternatives: HubSpot Sales Hub
Mistral SmallLeadAngel, LeanData alternatives: Chili Piper, HubSpot Sales Hub, RevenueHero
GPT-6 LunaLeanData, RevenueHero alternatives: Chili Piper, HubSpot Sales Hub

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniLeanData alternatives: Chili Piper
Qwen 3.7 FlashJunction alternatives: LeadReactor, Salesforce LeadScore, Seamless.AI
Kimi K2RevenueHero alternatives: LeadAngel
MiniMax M2.5LeadAngel alternatives: Chili Piper, LeanData

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
HubSpot Sales Hub leads by twenty points.
HubSpot Sales Hub20%#2 of 11
Default0%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
HubSpot Sales Hub leads by seven points.
HubSpot Sales Hub9%#4 of 11
Default2%#7 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
HubSpot Sales Hub2%#8 of 9
Default2%#7 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about HubSpot Sales Hub

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“CRM-native routing tools, such as those offered by Salesforce, HubSpot, and Pipedrive, may be sufficient for small teams ... but may not be suitable for larger teams” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · soft negative

What the models said about Default

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Default is repeatedly recommended for mid-market inbound routing + scheduling automation.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Positions itself around visual workflows that can combine routing with enrichment, qualification, scheduling, CRM updates, and fallbacks” GPT-6 Luna · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Default if you want one platform that integrates easily to handle data enrichment, instantly qualifies forms, escalates leads” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.