Five of twelve models named LeanData first on the direct prompt; five named Chili Piper. LeanData was named by twelve of the twelve models and Chili Piper by eleven and LeanData carries 55 labels and Chili Piper 46, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the lead routing and management page.
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“here are the lead routing and management tools you should avoid or be cautious about... LeanData Common Issues: - Complex interface” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“trying to buy enterprise-level lead routing platforms like LeanData, Default, or full Chili Piper suites can be incredibly frustrating” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“LeanData / 6sense / ZoomInfo GTM Studio — Mid-five to six-figure contracts” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“The gold standard for Salesforce-native environments... LeanData is the market leader. However, it requires experienced RevOps administrators to maintain.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“start by evaluating Chili Piper if your bottleneck is inbound conversion speed, or LeanData if your bottleneck is messy routing logic” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“LeanData | Enterprise, complex Salesforce environments | Lead-to-account matching, territories, ownership governance, audit depth” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“full Chili Piper suites can be incredibly frustrating, as they often require five-figure annual contracts” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid on a Limited Budget - Chili Piper — Now starts at $15,000/year minimum” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Limited Budgets - Chili Piper — starts at $15,000/year (enterprise pricing)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · hard negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, I recommend starting with Chili Piper as your primary routing and scheduling tool.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.