AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Propensity · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Propensity

24Judge labels
10First choices
2Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in ABM for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 130 in the mid-market standing
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In proximity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Propensity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Retail, proximity and IoT marketingMarketing7%4 of 1300%4under 10 labels · led by Foursquare Proximity at 15%▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Account-based marketing platformsMarketing0%31 of 710%2under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 53%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Propensity held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Proximity · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 77 of 145, unchanged
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
3%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 12 of 120
Enterprise▲+7Since September 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
7%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 84 → 4 of 115

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Proximity4%3%▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 9 → 4 of 130
ABM0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 51 → 31 of 71

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Propensity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna20002
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels7
Paraphrase6 labels3
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 10 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall for B2B & ABM Integration: Propensity ... is the premier choice for mid-market B2B teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proximity · direct prompt · first choice
“For a mid-market B2B company, I'd shortlist Propensity first” GPT-6 Luna · Proximity · direct prompt · first choice
“For a mid-sized B2B company, I'd start with Propensity” GPT-6 Luna · Proximity · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“a contact-level ABM platform that offers geofencing capabilities. It seems targeted toward mid-market B2B teams” MiniMax M2.5 · Proximity · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Propensity, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Propensity was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
AdRoll ABM10 of 244Not among the top eight
HubSpot Marketing Hub9 of 245Not among the top eight
6sense8 of 240Not among the top eight
Demandbase8 of 240Not among the top eight
Apollo.io4 of 241Not among the top eight
GroundTruth4 of 241Not among the top eight
Foursquare Proximity4 of 240Not among the top eight
Leadiro4 of 240Not among the top eight
Terminus4 of 240Not among the top eight
Foundry ABM3 of 240Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Propensity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named Propensity and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

propensity.comYour site12
gartner.com8
pipeline.zoominfo.com8
abmatic.ai7
demandbase.com7
g2.com7
warmly.ai7
zenabm.com7
cleverly.co5
prospeo.io5

Sixty-one of the seventy-three domain citations in answers naming Propensity came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

propensity.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Propensity takes 7% of first choices and Foursquare Proximity takes 15%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “proximity marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best proximity marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
40,500 a month (“propensity”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1,015 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 4,134 a month
Searches its site ranks for
135 · 7 in the top three
Sites linking to it
640
Paid Google search
4 searches its ads show for, about 68 clicks and $1,093 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
72 ads · 48 text, 24 image · 24 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2023, as addapptation, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 40 in the year, 32 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
7%
rank 4 of 130 in proximity
Segment leader
15%
Foursquare Proximity
First choices
10 across its categories
Named in
24 answers
Its own site cited
in 24 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on propensity.com
203
subdomains included
Content
132
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
12 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog117undatedABM, CRM
Comparison11undatedABM
Glossary or explainer2undated
Case study1undated
Report or ebook1undatedABM
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page propensity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Propensity

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Propensity is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Contact-level marketing platform for B2B growth teams
For
B2B growth teams
Price stated
Plans propensity.com
Starting price
$2,000/mo propensity.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Try for free propensity.com
Certifications
GDPR-compliantSOC 2ISO 27001:2022
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting, customers

What Propensity's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: propensity.com, propensity.com, propensity.com/pricing, trust.propensity.com, propensity.com/solutions/sales. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Propensity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Propensity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Propensity by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Propensity is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Propensity, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at propensity.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.