GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Foursquare Proximity · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Foursquare Proximity

13Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Proximity for enterprise buyers
Rank 19 of 131 in the mid-market standing
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In proximity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Foursquare Proximity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Retail, proximity and IoT marketingMarketing2%19 of 1310%1under 10 labels · led by Radar at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Foursquare Proximity yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Foursquare Proximity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels3
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Foursquare Proximity is the strongest pure proximity/geofencing option I found for mid-market B2B use cases” GPT-5.4 mini · Proximity · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Foursquare Proximity, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Foursquare Proximity was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Radar9 of 133Not in the top three
Gimbal8 of 134Not in the top three
GroundTruth7 of 130Not in the top three
InMarket7 of 130Not in the top three
Kontakt.io7 of 130Not in the top three
Bluedot4 of 130Not in the top three
DWELL2 of 130Not in the top three
Notificare1 of 131Not in the top three
6sense1 of 130Not in the top three
Aisle4111 of 130Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Foursquare Proximity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 13 answers that named Foursquare Proximity and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com3
capterra.com2
avsystem.com1
beonic.com1
devopsschool.com1
f6s.com1
g2.com1
gitnux.org1
improvado.io1
insiderone.com1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Foursquare Proximity came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Foursquare Labs, Inc. is the company behind Foursquare Proximity.
Website
foursquare.com
Headquarters
New York City, United States
Founded
2009

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Foursquare Proximity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Foursquare Proximity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at foursquare.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack