AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › InMarket · October 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

InMarket

31Judge labels
2First choices
16Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Proximity for mid-market buyers
Rank 9 of 130 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 27% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of InMarket →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In proximity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named InMarket for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Retail, proximity and IoT marketingMarketing4%9 of 13027%11criticized challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Mobile appsMarketing0%112 of 117100%2under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Audience and consumer insights platformsMarketing0%153 of 155100%1under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19%
Identity resolutionGTM data and infrastructure0%124 of 140100%1under 10 labels · led by Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution at 12%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Market intelligence platformsGTM data and infrastructure0%163 of 172100%1under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17%

Movement

Since September 2026, InMarket held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Proximity · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 142 → 121 of 145
Mid-market▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 13 → 6 of 120
Enterprise▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 5 → 31 of 115

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Proximity2%5%▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 13 → 9 of 130
Mobile apps0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 112 of 117, unchanged
Identity0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 129 → 124 of 140

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated InMarket across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00022
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2010012
Mistral Small11013
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K211002
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00033
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels2
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative18 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“"Inmarket" and "GroundTruth Ads Manager" are highlighted for their governance and oversight features, making them safer choices” Mistral Small · Proximity · negative prompt · first choice
“InMarket (Top Pick for Mid-Market B2B) ... Frequently ranked #1 for mid-market proximity marketing” Grok 4.20 · Proximity · direct prompt · first choice
“InMarket (GeoLink) — *Best Overall for Mid-Market B2B*” Kimi K2 · Proximity · direct prompt · first choice
“Had a 2024 regulatory setback (banned from selling precise data without consent), so verify current compliance posture.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Proximity · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“The FTC has taken action against location-data companies like InMarket, Kochava, and X-Mode/Outlogic over precisely those kinds of practices.” GPT-5.4 mini · Proximity · negative prompt · hard negative
“the FTC has specifically highlighted their location-data practices as part of broader concerns about mass surveillance” GPT-5.4 mini · Identity · negative prompt · hard negative
“the FTC finalized orders involving InMarket and Gravy Analytics/Venntel over sensitive location-data practices” GPT-6 Luna · Market intelligence · negative prompt · hard negative
“InMarket also agreed to an order prohibiting the sale or licensing of precise location data” GPT-6 Luna · Audience insights · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as InMarket, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and InMarket was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Gravy Analytics / Venntel10 of 310Not among the top eight
Mobilewalla9 of 310Not among the top eight
Outlogic8 of 310Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named InMarket. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 31 answers that named InMarket and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com16
worldmetrics.org15
gitnux.org14
thecmo.com14
f6s.com12
gtm-ai-index.com12
zipdo.co11
gartner.com10
foursquare.com9
ftc.gov9

122 of the 122 domain citations in answers naming InMarket came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

inmarket.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, InMarket takes 4% of first choices and Foursquare Proximity takes 15%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “proximity marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best proximity marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,400 a month (“inmarket”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
82 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,543 a month
Searches its site ranks for
250 · 24 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,675
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
8 ads · 6 text, 1 image, 1 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2024, as InMarket Media, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 6 in the year, 2 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 9 of 130 in proximity
Segment leader
15%
Foursquare Proximity
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
31 answers
Its own site cited
in 31 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on inmarket.com
1,657
subdomains included
Content
902
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
11 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog799152026-09-25
Conference or event3162026-08-31
Webinar or virtual event2912026-07-21
Case study2202026-01-20
Report or ebook1702025-12-04
Comparison302026-03-11
News or press102025-06-01
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page inmarket.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as InMarket

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as InMarket; a claim can dispute any of them.
Inmarket 2InMarket (GeoLink) 1inMarket 1

Follow InMarket

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

InMarket is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The leading real-time marketing and measurement platform
For
marketers
Customers named
Danone SilkBayerDunkin’United AirlinesPMGWurlBob Evans FarmsFrisch’s Big Boy
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What InMarket's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: inmarket.com, inmarket.com/solutions, inmarket.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when InMarket's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as InMarket, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for InMarket by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where InMarket is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name InMarket, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at inmarket.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.