| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retail, proximity and IoT marketing | Marketing | 4% | 9 of 130 | 27% | 11 | criticized challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Mobile apps | Marketing | 0% | 112 of 117 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Audience and consumer insights platforms | Marketing | 0% | 153 of 155 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19% | |
| Identity resolution | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 124 of 140 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution at 12% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Market intelligence platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 163 of 172 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximity | 2% | 5% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 9 of 130 |
| Mobile apps | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 112 of 117, unchanged |
| Identity | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 129 → 124 of 140 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“"Inmarket" and "GroundTruth Ads Manager" are highlighted for their governance and oversight features, making them safer choices” Mistral Small · Proximity · negative prompt · first choice
“InMarket (Top Pick for Mid-Market B2B) ... Frequently ranked #1 for mid-market proximity marketing” Grok 4.20 · Proximity · direct prompt · first choice
“InMarket (GeoLink) — *Best Overall for Mid-Market B2B*” Kimi K2 · Proximity · direct prompt · first choice
“Had a 2024 regulatory setback (banned from selling precise data without consent), so verify current compliance posture.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Proximity · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“The FTC has taken action against location-data companies like InMarket, Kochava, and X-Mode/Outlogic over precisely those kinds of practices.” GPT-5.4 mini · Proximity · negative prompt · hard negative
“the FTC has specifically highlighted their location-data practices as part of broader concerns about mass surveillance” GPT-5.4 mini · Identity · negative prompt · hard negative
“the FTC finalized orders involving InMarket and Gravy Analytics/Venntel over sensitive location-data practices” GPT-6 Luna · Market intelligence · negative prompt · hard negative
“InMarket also agreed to an order prohibiting the sale or licensing of precise location data” GPT-6 Luna · Audience insights · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 31 answers that named InMarket and are not a share of its labels.
122 of the 122 domain citations in answers naming InMarket came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 799 | 15 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Conference or event | 31 | 6 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 29 | 1 | 2026-07-21 | ||
| Case study | 22 | 0 | 2026-01-20 | ||
| Report or ebook | 17 | 0 | 2025-12-04 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2026-03-11 | ||
| News or press | 1 | 0 | 2025-06-01 |
Every page inmarket.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What InMarket's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: inmarket.com, inmarket.com/solutions, inmarket.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when InMarket's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as InMarket, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for InMarket by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: