Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 106 of 130, unchanged
Outlogic
14Judge labels
0First choices
14Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Outlogic was named 8 times in Mobile apps and 4 other categories, where Customer.io led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business112 of 138
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market117 of 117
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In mobile apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Outlogic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile apps | Marketing | 0% | 117 of 117 | 100% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Retail, proximity and IoT marketing | Marketing | 0% | 129 of 130 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Foursquare Proximity at 15% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Audience and consumer insights platforms | Marketing | 0% | 154 of 155 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19% | |
| Identity resolution | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 127 of 140 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution at 12% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
| Sales intelligence and contact data | Sales | 0% | 49 of 52 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Outlogic held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Mobile apps · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 103 of 105, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile apps | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 117 of 117, unchanged |
| Proximity | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 129 of 130, unchanged |
| Identity | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 132 → 127 of 140 |
| Sales intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 49 of 52, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Outlogic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Outlogic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative14 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Strongest red flags... X-Mode / Outlogic: The FTC finalized an order barring them from sharing or selling sensitive location data” GPT-6 Luna · Identity · negative prompt · hard negative
“The FTC has specifically prohibited companies like X-Mode/Outlogic and Gravy Analytics/Venntel from selling sensitive location data.” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“order prohibiting data broker X-Mode Social and its successor Outlogic from sharing or selling any sensitive location data” Muse Glimmer 30B · Proximity · negative prompt · hard negative
“The FTC finalized orders restricting this kind of data use by Gravy Analytics/Venntel and X-Mode/Outlogic” GPT-6 Luna · Audience insights · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Outlogic, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Outlogic was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Outlogic, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Outlogic was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Outlogic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Outlogic and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ftc.gov10
search.ftc.gov5
adlibrary.com3
gtm-ai-index.com3
moburst.com3
reddit.com3
rplg.io3
consumer.ftc.gov2
docs.liveramp.com2
luc.edu2
No domain is on file for Outlogic, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Outlogic
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Outlogic; a claim can dispute any of them.
X-Mode/Outlogic 4X-Mode / Outlogic 1
Follow Outlogic
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Outlogic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Outlogic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Outlogic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Outlogic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Outlogic, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.