GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Fiverr · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Fiverr

8Judge labels

0First choices

8Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Fiverr was named 3 times in Content marketing and 2 other categories, where HubSpot Content Hub led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business120 of 150

under the label threshold

Mid-market141 of 159

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In content marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Fiverr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Content marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	141 of 159	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 30%
Mobile apps	Marketing	0%	127 of 136	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Meta Advantage+ App Campaigns at 15%
Search and social advertising platforms	Marketing	0%	128 of 137	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 10%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fiverr yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fiverr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	2
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Freelance platforms (like Fiverr or Upwork) are flooded with sellers offering "10,000 App Installs for $50."...Who to Avoid: Anyone selling "guaranteed" installs outside of recognized ad networks” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mobile apps · negative prompt · hard negative

“Cheap Freelance Marketplaces (Fiverr, Upwork for Content) Why avoid for content marketing:” Kimi K2 · Content marketing · negative prompt · hard negative

“never recommended for purchasing actual ad traffic” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Paid ads · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fiverr, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fiverr was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Upwork3 of 80Not in the top three

Google Ads2 of 81Not in the top three

Meta Ads2 of 80Not in the top three

AdFlint1 of 81Not in the top three

Adzooma1 of 81Not in the top three

Birdeye1 of 81Not in the top three

Brand241 of 81Not in the top three

Collabstr1 of 81Not in the top three

Determ1 of 81Not in the top three

Reputation1 of 81Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

Names read as Fiverr

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Fiverr; a claim can dispute any of them.

Fiverr (for traffic) 1

The company

Fiverr.

Website: fiverr.com
Headquarters: Israel
Founded: 2010

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fiverr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fiverr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fiverr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.