Kontakt.io vs InMarket
Zero of twelve models named Kontakt.io first on the direct prompt; one named InMarket. Kontakt.io was named by eleven of the twelve models and InMarket by seven and Kontakt.io carries 27 labels and InMarket 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the retail, proximity and iot marketing page.
By framing
Kontakt.ioFirst choices, of twelve modelsInMarket
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Kontakt.io and InMarket were named in the same answer eighteen times, of the 68 answers naming Kontakt.io and the 33 naming InMarket. In those answers InMarket took the first choice three times and Kontakt.io three.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
Kontakt.io InMarket first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Kontakt.io on the left and InMarket on the right.The direct prompt
InMarket first, Kontakt.io not the choice
1 of 12 modelsKontakt.io was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
7 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Kontakt.io0%#7 of 7InMarket0%#– of 7Kontakt.io2%#5 of 8InMarket2%#7 of 8Kontakt.io5%#5 of 9InMarket5%#6 of 9What the models said about Kontakt.io
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Avoid: Enterprise tools like Kontakt.io” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“more of a managed, enterprise-leaning solution, so it's usually not the cheapest choice for a tight budget” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Kontakt.io (Best Overall) ... Highest overall score (9.6/10) across features, ease of use, and value” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Kontakt.io is considered the best overall platform for indoor location, with a score of 9.6/10.” Llama 4 Maverick · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best overall: Kontakt.io (enterprise) and Foursquare (no-hardware approach)” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about InMarket
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“settlements against location data sellers like InMarket (2024: banned from selling precise data without consent, forced data deletion)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“The best proximity marketing platform for a mid-market B2B company is Inmarket, as it scored highest across the combined criteria” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Need to prove sales impact? Choose InMarket.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“InMarket: best if your company actually runs physical-location campaigns” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.