Radar vs InMarket
One of fourteen models named Radar first on the direct prompt; two named InMarket. Radar was named by eleven of the fourteen models and InMarket by eight and Radar carries 29 labels and InMarket 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
New York City, United States, founded 2016. Named in two categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the retail, proximity and iot marketing page.
By framing
RadarFirst choices, of fourteen modelsInMarket
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Radar InMarket first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Radar on the left and InMarket on the right.The direct prompt
Radar first, InMarket an alternative
1 of 14 modelsInMarket was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.InMarket first, Radar an alternative
2 of 14 modelsRadar was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
What the models said about Radar
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Best for: Sensor-fusion geofencing at scale ... Excellent for retailers and venues needing scalable proximity event ingestion and campaign trigger rules” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd usually recommend Radar if you want one platform that can handle location-based triggers, geofencing, and in-store/proximity experiences” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Or Radar — if you already have an app and want precise geofencing, the $0.02/user cost gives you extreme flexibility.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about InMarket
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“The FTC has taken action against location-data companies like InMarket, Kochava, and X-Mode/Outlogic over precisely those kinds of practices.” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · hard negative
“"Inmarket" and "GroundTruth Ads Manager" are highlighted for their governance and oversight features, making them safer choices” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
“InMarket (Top Pick for Mid-Market B2B) ... Frequently ranked #1 for mid-market proximity marketing” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
“InMarket (GeoLink) — *Best Overall for Mid-Market B2B*” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.