Small business▼−10Since September 2026: 10% → 0%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 10% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 2 → 31 of 145
PlotProjects
31Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Proximity for mid-market buyers
Rank 12 of 130 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of PlotProjects →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business37 of 158
0%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market12 of 130
2%10 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise31 of 124
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
In proximity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PlotProjects for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retail, proximity and IoT marketing | Marketing | 2% | 12 of 130 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 3%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PlotProjects held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Proximity · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 3%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
3%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 4 → 10 of 120
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 22 → 30 of 115
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximity | 6% | 3% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 3%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 12 of 130 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PlotProjects across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PlotProjects across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative12 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd start with PlotProjects if you need actual proximity marketing, because it's surfaced as a strong small-business geofencing option” GPT-5.4 mini · Proximity · budget prompt · first choice
“PlotProjects — Strong beacon-triggered campaigns and indoor venue layouts if you have physical venues.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Proximity · scale prompt · alternative
“Choose PlotProjects, Estimote, or Purple if you need in-venue experiences tied to beacons” Perplexity Sonar · Proximity · comparative prompt · alternative
“Runner-Up: PlotProjects ... starting at approximately $100/month. This is highly affordable” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proximity · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“can make them a poor fit if you want a simple plug-and-play marketing tool” Perplexity Sonar · Proximity · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PlotProjects, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PlotProjects was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PlotProjects, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PlotProjects was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PlotProjects. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 31 answers that named PlotProjects and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
thecmo.com28
worldmetrics.org25
g2.com23
zipdo.co22
gitnux.org19
us.fitgap.com15
f6s.com14
sourceforge.net14
clevertap.com9
guideflow.com8
No domain is on file for PlotProjects, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where PlotProjects stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where PlotProjects stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 40 a month (“plotprojects”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Its own site
- No site of its own on file, so no site figures
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 130 in proximity
Segment leader
15%
Foursquare Proximity
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 31 answers
- Its own site cited
- No site on file to match
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as PlotProjects
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PlotProjects; a claim can dispute any of them.
Plot Projects 2
Follow PlotProjects
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PlotProjects's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PlotProjects, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PlotProjects by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PlotProjects is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PlotProjects, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.