Every category where a model named CustomerLabs 1PD Ops for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Identity resolution	GTM data and infrastructure	6%	5 of 151	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CustomerLabs 1PD Ops yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CustomerLabs 1PD Ops across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative14 labels8not counted in share

Budget-constrained14 labels5

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend starting with CustomerLabs at $129/month if you need a complete solution” Mistral Small · Identity · budget prompt · first choice

“If you have a limited budget, CustomerLabs is your best bet.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Identity · budget prompt · first choice

“CustomerLabs 1PD Ops — Best Overall Value” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity · budget prompt · first choice

“if you need first-party data collection and activation without heavy engineering, though this is more of a marketing ops choice” Perplexity Sonar · Identity · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CustomerLabs 1PD Ops, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CustomerLabs 1PD Ops was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LiveRamp31 of 385Not in the top three

FullContact21 of 382Not in the top three

Segment19 of 384Not in the top three

Amperity18 of 381Not in the top three

Tealium15 of 380Not in the top three

Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution13 of 381Not in the top three

Hightouch12 of 381Not in the top three

Leadpipe11 of 383Not in the top three

Prospeo11 of 383Not in the top three

mParticle11 of 380Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CustomerLabs 1PD Ops. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 38 answers that named CustomerLabs 1PD Ops and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com2

gitnux.org2

guideflow.com2

prospeo.io2

softwaresuggest.com2

tilores.io2

worldmetrics.org2

checkthat.ai1

ciente.io1

dataladder.com1

Seventeen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming CustomerLabs 1PD Ops came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/identity-resolution2

g2.com/discussions/what-identity-resolution-software-works-best-for-a-marketing-team-that-2

gitnux.org/best/identity-resolution-software2

guideflow.com/blog/identity-resolution-software2

prospeo.io/s/identity-resolution-software2

softwaresuggest.com/identity-resolution-software2

tilores.io/content/best-identity-resolution-platforms-20262

worldmetrics.org/best/identity-resolution-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CustomerLabs 1PD Ops's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CustomerLabs 1PD Ops, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at customer.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.