Every category where a model named Prospeo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Identity resolution	GTM data and infrastructure	4%	7 of 140	0%	10	accepted challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Email verification	GTM data and infrastructure	2%	11 of 65	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by ZeroBounce at 42%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Market intelligence platforms	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	37 of 172	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17%
Account-based marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	18 of 71	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 53%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
B2B intent data providers	Sales	0%	17 of 60	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 27%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	0%	34 of 123	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Data enrichment	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	18 of 50	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Email deliverability and testing tools	Marketing	0%	36 of 110	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by GlockApps at 34%
Competitive intelligence tools	Marketing	0%	31 of 86	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Kompyte at 38%
Lead routing and management	Sales	0%	90 of 111	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Sales intelligence and contact data	Sales	0%	17 of 52	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Prospeo held within the floor in all eleven categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Identity · by segment

Small business▼−3Since September 2026: 10% → 8%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

8%from 10% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 125

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

5%from 4% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 5 of 131

Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

2%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 64 → 18 of 89

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Email verification	0%	2%	▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 22 → 11 of 65
Identity	4%	5%	=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 8 → 7 of 140
Market intelligence	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 37 of 172, unchanged
ABM	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 18 of 71, unchanged
Intent data	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 36 → 17 of 60
Territory planning	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 34 of 123, unchanged
Enrichment	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 18 of 50, unchanged
Email deliverability	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 36 of 110, unchanged
Competitive intel	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 31 of 86, unchanged
Lead routing	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 90 of 111, unchanged
Sales intel	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 26 → 17 of 52

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Prospeo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	1	3
Grok 4.20	0	2	2	0	4
Mistral Small	0	2	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	4	0	7
Llama 4 Maverick	2	4	2	0	8
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Kimi K2	0	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	1	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	6	1	0	8
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct22 labels4

Paraphrase9 labels4

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained40 labels2

Scale-constrained10 labels1

Negative10 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative99 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Prospeo - for B2B contact resolution with 300M+ profiles and 98% accuracy, starting at free (75 emails/mo)” Llama 4 Maverick · Identity · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Prospeo: Best for B2B accuracy and catch-all resolution, with a price anchor of ~$0.01/email.” Llama 4 Maverick · Email verification · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“starting with FullContact's free tier or Prospeo's free plan” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity · budget prompt · first choice

“offers sales planning software that includes real territory management, quota modeling, and scenario planning for teams with 30-200 reps” Llama 4 Maverick · Territory planning · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Not a routing engine itself; it helps improve routing quality by cleaning data first.” Perplexity Sonar · Lead routing · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Prospeo, over the 99 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Prospeo was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Apollo.io31 of 9916Not among the top eight

ZoomInfo23 of 990Not among the top eight

Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution20 of 996Compare →

FullContact16 of 992Compare →

6sense15 of 992Not among the top eight

LiveRamp Identity Resolution15 of 990Compare →

Salesforce Data Cloud14 of 990Not among the top eight

Demandbase13 of 991Not among the top eight

Lusha13 of 991Not among the top eight

Cognism12 of 990Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Prospeo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 99 of the 99 answers that named Prospeo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

prospeo.ioYour site98

guideflow.com44

pipeline.zoominfo.com44

sourceforge.net26

oppora.ai25

softwaresuggest.com24

us.fitgap.com22

tomba.io19

checkthat.ai18

g2.com17

239 of the 337 domain citations in answers naming Prospeo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

prospeo.io/s/identity-resolution-software32

oppora.ai/blog/identity-resolution-software24

guideflow.com/blog/identity-resolution-software20

softwaresuggest.com/identity-resolution-software19

scmgalaxy.com/tutorials/top-10-identity-resolution-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison17

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-identity-resolution-tools16

sourceforge.net/software/identity-resolution15

gtm-ai-index.com/gtm-data/identity-resolution/smb14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

prospeo.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Prospeo takes 4% of first choices and Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution takes 12%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “identity resolution platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best identity resolution platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 2,400 a month (“prospeo”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 19 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 403,704 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 195,396 · 337 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,976
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

23 ads · 14 image, 7 text, 2 video · 14 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2026, as Defastra Tech Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 23 in the year. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 7 of 140 in identity

Segment leader

12%

Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution

First choices: 11 across its categories
Named in: 99 answers
Its own site cited: in 99 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on prospeo.io

97,505

subdomains included

Content

8,369

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

1 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Comparison	8,003	undated		CRM, Email verification
Glossary or explainer	278	undated		CPQ, CRM
Template or tool	35	undated
Case study	16	undated
Conference or event	16	undated
Webinar or virtual event	6	undated
Report or ebook	6	0	2011-11-10
Podcast or video	6	undated
Blog	2	undated
News or press	1	undated

Most recent

2011-11-10Challenger sale book report or ebook

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page prospeo.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CRM (68); 22 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Prospeo

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Prospeo; a claim can dispute any of them.

Prospeo.io 2

Follow Prospeo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Prospeo is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Build leads list with verified emails & mobiles
prospeo.io/c/plansee
For: For Lead Generation agencies, For Sales Leader, For Founders, For RevOps
prospeo.io/c/plansee
Free plan or trial: Get Targeted Leads for free prospeo.io/c/plansee
Integrations claimed: 25 prospeo.io/c/platforme
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, certifications, hosting, customers

What Prospeo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: prospeo.io, prospeo.io/c/plansee, prospeo.io/c/trust, prospeo.io/c/platforme, prospeo.io/c/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Prospeo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Prospeo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Prospeo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Prospeo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Prospeo, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.