AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Oppora · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Oppora

15Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Oppora was named 4 times in Identity and 1 other category, where Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution led with 12%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In identity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Oppora for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Identity resolutionGTM data and infrastructure0%45 of 1400%3under 10 labels · led by Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution at 12%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
AI SDR agentsSales0%63 of 770%1under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 24%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Oppora held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Identity · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 of 125, unchanged
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 40 of 131, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 73 of 89, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Identity0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 45 of 140, unchanged
AI SDR0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 63 of 77, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Oppora across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained6 labels3
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Oppora - for data activation with post-resolution enrichment, contact enrichment, and outreach” Llama 4 Maverick · Identity · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Oppora (free plan)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Identity · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oppora, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oppora was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Prospeo9 of 154Not among the top eight
Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution7 of 150Not among the top eight
LiveRamp Identity Resolution6 of 150Not among the top eight
FullContact5 of 150Not among the top eight
Salesforce Data Cloud5 of 150Not among the top eight
CustomerLabs 1PD Ops4 of 151Not among the top eight
ZoomInfo4 of 150Not among the top eight
6sense3 of 150Not among the top eight
Zingg2 of 152Not among the top eight
Dealfront2 of 151Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oppora. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named Oppora and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

oppora.aiYour site15
prospeo.io12
sourceforge.net9
guideflow.com7
softwaresuggest.com7
checkthat.ai6
scmgalaxy.com5
us.fitgap.com5
g2.com4
gtm-ai-index.com4

Fifty-nine of the seventy-four domain citations in answers naming Oppora came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on oppora.ai
659
subdomains included
Content
550
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
23 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog46442026-10-04CRM, ABM
Comparison7122026-10-03
Glossary or explainer11undatedCRM
Case study3undated
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page oppora.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Oppora

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Oppora is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI Outbound Sales Agent for Automated Outreach
For
SolopreneursFounders; sales teams; small & medium businesses; agencies; enterprise
Price stated
Free plan·Pro $34/mo·Max $79/mo oppora.ai
Starting price
0 oppora.ai
Free plan or trial
Free plan; No credit card; Start Free; Start for Free oppora.ai
Integrations claimed
51 oppora.ai · 4 oppora.ai/pricing pages disagree
Customers named
BlueBix SolutionsSoftStandard SolutionsPetabytz Technologies IncEversheds SutherlandDiligent RoboticsSCG GlobalPearsonSoftStandard
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications, hosting

What Oppora's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: oppora.ai, oppora.ai/pricing, oppora.ai/product, oppora.ai/case-studies, oppora.ai/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oppora's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oppora, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Oppora by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Oppora is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Oppora, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oppora.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.