AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Intentsify · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Intentsify

16Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Intent data for mid-market buyers
Rank 15 of 60 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business48 of 68
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 60
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise11 of 46
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In intent data · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Intentsify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
B2B intent data providersSales0%15 of 600%8under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 27%▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Audio and podcast advertisingMarketing0%28 of 1010%2under 10 labels · led by AudioGo at 34%

Movement

Since September 2026, Intentsify held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Intent data · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 4 → 15 of 58
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 of 44, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Intent data4%0%▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 4 → 15 of 60
Audio advertising0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 28 of 101, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Intentsify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash03003
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00202

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Intentsify: 4.4/5 on G2 (40+ reviews), AI-powered comprehensive signals. Suited for mid-market lead gen/advertising.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Intent data · direct prompt · alternative
“Want a modern, vendor-neutral aggregator with best-in-class offering? → Intentsify” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Intent data · comparative prompt · alternative
“if account-level intent targeting is your priority, Intentsify is worth evaluating” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Audio advertising · direct prompt · alternative
“Start with Bombora (or Intentsify) as your third-party, topic-level intent foundation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Intent data · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Intentsify, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Intentsify was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bombora14 of 167Not among the top eight
6sense12 of 163Not among the top eight
G2 Buyer Intent12 of 161Not among the top eight
Demandbase11 of 163Not among the top eight
ZoomInfo10 of 160Not among the top eight
TechTarget Priority Engine9 of 160Not among the top eight
Dealfront5 of 160Not among the top eight
Cognism4 of 160Not among the top eight
TrustRadius4 of 160Not among the top eight
Apollo.io3 of 160Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Intentsify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Intentsify and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

demandbase.com12
autobound.ai8
martal.ca8
percepture.com8
rb2b.com8
factors.ai7
pipeline.zoominfo.com6
default.com5
guideflow.com5
salesintel.io5

Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Intentsify came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

demandbase.com/blog/b2b-intent-data-providers12
autobound.ai/blog/top-15-intent-data-providers-compared-20268
martal.ca/intent-data-providers-lb8
percepture.com/sales-intelligence/best-b2b-intent-data-providers8
rb2b.com/learn/intent-data-providers8
factors.ai/blog/top-intent-data-platforms7
default.com/post/b2b-intent-data-providers5
salesintel.io/blog/the-7-best-b2b-intent-data-providers5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

intentsify.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Intentsify takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 27%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “b2b intent data provider”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best b2b intent data provider”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
590 a month (“intentsify”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
10 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 3,250 a month
Searches its site ranks for
924 · 14 in the top three
Sites linking to it
598
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
12 ads · 12 text · 5 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2024, as Intentsify, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 7 in the year, 5 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 60 in intent data
Segment leader
27%
Apollo.io
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
16 answers
Its own site cited
in 16 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on intentsify.io
461
subdomains included
Content
363
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
22 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog26642026-09-10ABM, Intent data
News or press4252026-09-01Intent data
Comparison1812026-08-31
Webinar or virtual event1102026-06-22
Conference or event802026-04-13
Report or ebook602024-09-09
Glossary or explainer502025-02-13
Template or tool302021-03-11
Case study202026-05-01
Podcast or video202026-02-06

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on intentsify.io state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page intentsify.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ABM (14); 3 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Intentsify

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Intentsify is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Intent Based Marketing Software
intentsify.io
For
B2B businesses
intentsify.io
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Intentsify's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: intentsify.io, trust.intentsify.io, intentsify.io/solutions/quantumdemand, intentsify.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Intentsify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Intentsify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Intentsify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Intentsify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Intentsify, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at intentsify.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.