Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 37 → 50 of 53
4 categories · RankedSalesIntel
24Judge labels
2First choices
9Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Sales intel for mid-market buyers
Rank 51 of 52 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 57% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business53 of 55
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market51 of 52
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise4 of 45
4%6 labels
under the label threshold
In sales intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SalesIntel for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales intelligence and contact data | Sales | 0% | 51 of 52 | 57% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 0% | 53 of 60 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 111 of 142 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Data enrichment | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 39 of 50 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SalesIntel held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Sales intel · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 37 → 49 of 50
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 32 → 4 of 41
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 37 → 51 of 52 |
| Intent data | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 51 → 53 of 60 |
| Customer intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 111 of 142, unchanged |
| Enrichment | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 47 → 39 of 50 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SalesIntel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SalesIntel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels2
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“look at agile, modern mid-market alternatives (like Common Room, RB2B, or SalesIntel) that offer transparent pricing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Intent data · negative prompt · alternative
“Contact verification is the main pain point? Test SalesIntel alongside your other finalists.” GPT-6 Luna · Sales intel · comparative prompt · alternative
“SalesIntel (Best for Phone-Focused Teams)” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Repeatedly flagged for phone and contact accuracy problems... "the data quality is extremely poor and consistently unreliable"” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Trustpilot Rating: 2.3/5 with severe warnings ... Multiple reviewers described it as potentially fraudulent data scraping” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Strongly Avoid or High Caution: SalesIntel... Frequently called out as one of the worst in reviews.” Grok 4.20 · Sales intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Trustpilot: 2.3/5—reviewers reported ~95% of phone numbers were incorrect or disconnected” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales intel · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SalesIntel, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SalesIntel was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SalesIntel, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SalesIntel was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SalesIntel. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 24 answers that named SalesIntel and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pipeline.zoominfo.com12
salesintel.ioYour site9
demandbase.com8
salesmotion.io8
amplemarket.com7
lusha.com7
prospeo.io7
apollo.io6
g2.com6
capterra.com5
Sixty-six of the seventy-five domain citations in answers naming SalesIntel came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
salesintel.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SalesIntel takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 73%.ShowHide
Search and answers
salesintel.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SalesIntel takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 73%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “b2b contact data and sales intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best b2b contact data and sales intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“salesintel”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 28 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,339 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,877 · 31 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,634
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 3 clicks and $7 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 51 of 52 in sales intel
Segment leader
73%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 24 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 23 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on salesintel.io
1,300
subdomains included
Content
1,093
counted in the table below
Documentation
18
Product · Integration
16 · 10
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 624 | 11 | 2026-09-22 | ABM, Enrichment | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 179 | 4 | 2026-09-24 | ABM, CRM | |
| Podcast or video | 98 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 58 | 0 | 2025-01-31 | ABM, CRM | |
| Case study | 45 | 0 | 2026-06-18 | CRM | |
| Comparison | 36 | 1 | 2026-09-03 | ABM, Enrichment | |
| Conference or event | 26 | 1 | 2026-07-23 | ||
| News or press | 17 | 0 | 2026-03-10 | CDP | |
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 0 | 2025-08-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Ai automation gtm icp classification automated outbound webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-22Intent data not enough to act on blog
- 2026-09-22Automated follow up timing blog
- 2026-09-22Revenue signals crm misses blog
- 2026-09-14Precision icp orchestration blog
- 2026-09-03Predictive signals vs intent data comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page salesintel.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ABM (32); 12 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SalesIntel
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SalesIntel is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SalesIntel is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- SalesIntel is a pipeline generation platform for GTM teams
- For
- GTM teams
- Price stated
- flexible pricing for your team’s needs salesintel.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial salesintel.io
- Integrations claimed
- 50 salesintel.io · 8 salesintel.io/pricing pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2GDPR
- Customers named
- Leonard’s ExpressMaestro GroupLeadCoverageTALONOnDefendAlleyoopSimeraInky Technologies
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, hosting
What SalesIntel's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: salesintel.io, salesintel.io/pricing, trust.salesintel.io, salesintel.io/products, salesintel.io/category/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SalesIntel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SalesIntel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SalesIntel by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SalesIntel is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SalesIntel, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.