4 categories · RankedSalesIntel
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales intelligence and contact data | Sales | 0% | 38 of 44 | 40% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 76% |
| Data enrichment | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 50 of 56 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 70% |
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 0% | 52 of 62 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Bombora at 35% |
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 0% | 71 of 75 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 20% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“SalesIntel / UpLead | Highest contractual accuracy guarantees | Narrower global scope” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales intel · scale prompt · alternative
“with UpLead and SalesIntel offering accuracy guarantees/credit-backs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales intel · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“The data quality is extremely poor and consistently unreliable, with approximately 95% of contact phone numbers being incorrect” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“SalesIntel: Severe accuracy gaps ("95% of phones wrong/disconnected" per Trustpilot)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“reviews mention occasional outdated data for smaller companies and integration/mapping issues” GPT-5.4 mini · Revenue intel · negative prompt · soft negative
“Higher cost relative to competitors... No access to international data” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Enrichment · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 30 answers that named SalesIntel and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Nineteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming SalesIntel came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SalesIntel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SalesIntel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at salesintel.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.