AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Seamless.AI · October 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

Seamless.AI

74Judge labels
3First choices
34Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Sales intel for enterprise buyers
Rank 52 of 52 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 47% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Seamless.AI →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In sales intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Seamless.AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Sales intelligence and contact dataSales0%52 of 5247%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Data enrichmentGTM data and infrastructure0%49 of 5043%7under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Lead routing and managementSales0%27 of 1110%2under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Account-based marketing platformsMarketing0%69 of 71100%1under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 53%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Market intelligence platformsGTM data and infrastructure0%167 of 172100%1under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17%

Movement

Since September 2026, Seamless.AI held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Sales intel · by segment

Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 39 → 4 of 53
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 43 → 50 of 50
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 43 → 6 of 41

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Sales intel0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 43 → 52 of 52
Enrichment0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 53 → 49 of 50
Lead routing0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 27 of 111, unchanged
ABM0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 69 of 71, unchanged
Market intelligence0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 167 of 172, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Seamless.AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500022
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00134
Perplexity Sonar00303
Grok 4.1 Fast00112
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash02215
Kimi K200112
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500011
GPT-6 Luna00022
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels2
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative39 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative74 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Emphasizes real-time data freshness and AI-driven verification, but states it should not be used outside the US” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales intel · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best For: Mid-market companies looking for a middle ground between ZoomInfo's power and lower costs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales intel · comparative prompt · alternative
“The Best All-in-One (Inbound & Outbound): Seamless.AI” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lead routing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“If I had to single out one for extra caution, it would be Seamless.AI\u2014not necessarily because its data is always poor, but because of recurring complaints about auto-renewal and cancellation.” GPT-6 Luna · Sales intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“users frequently complain about its "accuracy" claims. Many professionals report receiving data that hasn't been updated since 2018–2020” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Enrichment · negative prompt · hard negative
“Users have reported "shady business practices" with issues including unclear contract cancellation policies and automatic renewals” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ABM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Notoriously criticized ... for having incredibly rigid contract terms, billing issues ... and high-pressure sales reps.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Enrichment · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Seamless.AI, over the 74 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Seamless.AI was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Apollo.io67 of 7414Not among the top eight
ZoomInfo65 of 748Not among the top eight
Lusha52 of 740Not among the top eight
Cognism44 of 748Not among the top eight
6sense17 of 740Not among the top eight
Clay16 of 740Not among the top eight
HubSpot Breeze Intelligence16 of 740Not among the top eight
UpLead15 of 744Not among the top eight
LinkedIn Sales Navigator14 of 741Not among the top eight
Demandbase13 of 740Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Seamless.AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 65 of the 74 answers that named Seamless.AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pipeline.zoominfo.com37
g2.com26
amplemarket.com25
apollo.io21
lusha.com21
salesmotion.io21
blog.hubspot.com14
reddit.com14
demandbase.com13
cognism.com11

203 of the 203 domain citations in answers naming Seamless.AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

seamless.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Seamless.AI takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 73%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “b2b contact data and sales intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best b2b contact data and sales intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
14,800 a month (“seamless.ai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
160 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 271,504 a month
Searches its site ranks for
143,000 · 1,276 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,359
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
116+ ads · 105 text, 8 video, 3 image · 82 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as SEAMLESS.AI, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 67 in the year, 49 before. 4 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 52 of 52 in sales intel
Segment leader
73%
Apollo.io
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
74 answers
Its own site cited
in 65 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on seamless.ai
592
subdomains included
Content
444
counted in the table below
Documentation
55
Product · Integration
38 · 16
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Case study392undated
News or press3012026-09-08
Comparison11undated
Template or tool10undated
Blog1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page seamless.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Seamless.AI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Seamless.AI; a claim can dispute any of them.
Seamless.ai 7

Follow Seamless.AI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Seamless.AI is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
A real-time search engine and AI sales platform for sales prospecting, lead generation, and revenue growth.
For
B2B companies; salespeople; sales teams; SDRs; RevOps; founders; marketing; recruiting; customer success; finance teams.
Price stated
Seamless.AI is free for up to 50 credits. After that, we offer many pricing options. seamless.ai
Free plan or trial
free for up to 50 credits seamless.ai
Integrations claimed
6000 seamless.ai
Certifications
GDPRCCPASOC 2 Type IIISO 27001SOC 2 Type 2
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, hosting, customers

What Seamless.AI's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: seamless.ai, seamless.ai/pricing, trust.seamless.ai, seamless.ai/products/mcp, seamless.ai/products/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Seamless.AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Seamless.AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Seamless.AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Seamless.AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Seamless.AI, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at seamless.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.