Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 5 → 6 of 53
6 categories · RankedUpLead
107Judge labels
3First choices
8Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Sales intel for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 52 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 25 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of UpLead →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 55
0%26 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 52
4%25 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise38 of 45
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In sales intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named UpLead for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales intelligence and contact data | Sales | 4% | 4 of 52 | 0% | 25 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data enrichment | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 8 of 50 | 7% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 0% | 27 of 60 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 27% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| CRM data quality and deduplication | Revenue operations | 0% | 82 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 43% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 0% | 102 of 111 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Market intelligence platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 78 of 172 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17% |
Movement
Since September 2026, UpLead held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Sales intel · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 5% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 50
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 → 34 of 41
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enrichment | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 8 of 50 |
| Sales intel | 5% | 5% | =heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 4 of 52 |
| Intent data | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 27 of 60 |
| CRM data quality | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 36 → 82 of 99 |
| Lead routing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 102 of 111, unchanged |
| Market intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 78 of 172, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated UpLead across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated UpLead across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct20 labels1
Paraphrase32 labels2
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained22 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative19 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative107 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“UpLead: Lowest accuracy complaint rate (~1.7% of reviews) with real-time verification and published methodology” Kimi K2 · Sales intel · negative prompt · first choice
“UpLead is frequently cited as the best mid-market option when data accuracy is critical” Mistral Small · Sales intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with UpLead or Apollo.io” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: UpLead” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Enrichment · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Affordable on-demand intent (~$99/month entry), but lighter on signals vs. Lusha/Apollo.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Intent data · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“UpLead reviews, for example, mention hidden billing and per-lead export charges.” GPT-5.4 mini · Lead routing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Limited coverage/filters; varying accuracy across industries; poor support.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Enrichment · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as UpLead, over the 107 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UpLead was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as UpLead, over the 107 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UpLead was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UpLead. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 101 of the 107 answers that named UpLead and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pipeline.zoominfo.com67
salesmotion.io52
demandbase.com42
apollo.io35
cleanlist.ai34
lusha.com31
salesgenie.com26
cognism.com25
uplead.comYour site24
salesforge.ai22
334 of the 358 domain citations in answers naming UpLead came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
uplead.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, UpLead takes 4% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 73%.ShowHide
Search and answers
uplead.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, UpLead takes 4% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 73%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “b2b contact data and sales intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best b2b contact data and sales intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 3,600 a month (“uplead”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 57 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 15,339 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,573 · 72 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,011
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 4 of 52 in sales intel
Segment leader
73%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 107 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 101 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on uplead.com
643
subdomains included
Content
190
counted in the table below
Documentation
86
Product · Integration
0 · 3
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 98 | 4 | 2026-07-16 | Email verification | |
| Comparison | 69 | 3 | 2026-08-24 | ABM | |
| Case study | 8 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2025-06-13 | ||
| Podcast or video | 6 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 0 | 2021-03-04 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-24Swordfish alternatives comparison
- 2026-08-24Aeroleads alternatives comparison
- 2026-08-24Adapt io alternatives comparison
- 2026-07-16Business owner email list blog
- 2026-07-16Chief procurement officer email list blog
- 2026-07-16General manager email list blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page uplead.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as UpLead
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as UpLead; a claim can dispute any of them.
Uplead 2
Follow UpLead
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
UpLead.ShowHide
The company
UpLead.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- uplead.com
- Headquarters
- Los Angeles, United States
- Founded
- 2017
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- B2B Database & Business Contact Data Provider
- For
- sales team
- Price stated
- 1/3 of the cost vs leading sales platforms uplead.com
- Starting price
- 0 uplead.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start your free 7-day trial today! uplead.com
- Integrations claimed
- 1500 uplead.com/pricing
- Certifications
- #1 Highest Rated Lead Intelligence Software by G2
- Customers named
- Kyber SecurityCode Red SafetyStaffing FutureWhitewater ConsultingFastsignsWilmot Modular StructuresComplete Merchant SolutionsTBM Consulting Group
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What UpLead's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: uplead.com, uplead.com/pricing, uplead.com/features, uplead.com/customers, uplead.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UpLead's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UpLead, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for UpLead by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where UpLead is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name UpLead, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.