GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › LinkedIn Sales Navigator · September 2026 Edition
LinkedIn · 4 categories · Ranked

LinkedIn Sales Navigator

50Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
4Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Sales intel for mid-market buyers
Rank 11 of 76 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In abm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LinkedIn Sales Navigator for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Account-based marketing platformsMarketing2%11 of 760%3under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 56%
Sales intelligence and contact dataSales0%7 of 440%14accepted challenger
B2B intent data providersSales0%36 of 620%2under 10 labels · led by Bombora at 35%
Lead routing and managementSales0%89 of 104100%1under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LinkedIn Sales Navigator yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LinkedIn Sales Navigator across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01012
Grok 4.1 Fast00202
Mistral Small02103
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00202
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.511103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase8 labelsNone
Comparative19 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative50 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with LinkedIn Sales Navigator (~$64/month) for account research and identification” MiniMax M2.5 · ABM · budget prompt · first choice
“LinkedIn Sales Navigator if your workflow is heavily relationship/network based.” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales intel · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose LinkedIn Sales Navigator if your strategy relies on social selling” Mistral Small · Sales intel · comparative prompt · alternative
“Intelligence Layer: LinkedIn Sales Navigator + 6sense for intent” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales intel · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High-cost prospecting tools such as LinkedIn Sales Navigator for high-volume cold email ... can make them inefficient” Perplexity Sonar · Lead routing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LinkedIn Sales Navigator, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LinkedIn Sales Navigator was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Apollo.io42 of 5013Not in the top three
6sense39 of 500Not in the top three
ZoomInfo35 of 5024Not in the top three
Demandbase33 of 500Not in the top three
Cognism29 of 505Not in the top three
Lusha21 of 500Not in the top three
Bombora14 of 500Not in the top three
HubSpot Breeze Intelligence13 of 500Not in the top three
Clay12 of 500Not in the top three
Gong12 of 500Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LinkedIn Sales Navigator. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 50 answers that named LinkedIn Sales Navigator and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cognism.com4
apollo.io2
avoma.com2
g2.com2
learn.g2.com2
lusha.com2
monday.com2
salesmotion.io2
5242563.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net1
abmatic.ai1

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming LinkedIn Sales Navigator came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

LinkedIn is the company behind LinkedIn Sales Navigator.
Website
linkedin.com
Headquarters
Sunnyvale, United States
Founded
2002

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LinkedIn Sales Navigator's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LinkedIn Sales Navigator, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at linkedin.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack