Every category where a model named GatherUp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Review and reputation management	Marketing	0%	27 of 103	10%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for GatherUp yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated GatherUp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Reputable platforms: Birdeye, Podium, ReviewTrackers, NiceJob, GatherUp, BrightLocal” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Reviews · negative prompt · alternative

“Strong for multi-location local/service businesses, plus agencies.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative

“Are you an agency managing clients? → Choose GatherUp” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative

“Are an agency? → Grade.us or GatherUp” Kimi K2 · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Quality has declined post-acquisition; review gating concerns.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Reviews · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as GatherUp, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GatherUp was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Birdeye27 of 295Not in the top three

Podium25 of 291Not in the top three

NiceJob20 of 295Not in the top three

BrightLocal18 of 291Not in the top three

Reputation15 of 292Not in the top three

Trustpilot10 of 290Not in the top three

ReviewGrower9 of 293Not in the top three

ReviewTrackers9 of 290Not in the top three

Reviewflowz8 of 293Not in the top three

Yext8 of 290Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GatherUp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 29 answers that named GatherUp and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

almcorp.com1

birdeye.com1

capterra.com1

cbinsights.com1

emitrr.com1

guideflow.com1

reviewflowz.com1

reviewtrackers.com1

revuze.it1

softwareadvice.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming GatherUp came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

almcorp.com/blog/top-reputation-management-tools1

birdeye.com/alternatives/podium-alternatives1

birdeye.com/compare1

capterra.com/p/164285/Podium1

capterra.com/p/239159/GatherUp/pricing1

cbinsights.com/compare/birdeye-vs-repdrive1

emitrr.com/blog/podium-alternative1

guideflow.com/blog/online-reputation-management-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GatherUp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GatherUp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at gatherup.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.