Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
6%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 11 → 5 of 90
1 category · RankedGatherUp
21Judge labels
4First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Reviews for small business buyers
Rank 34 of 92 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 14% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 97
7%13 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market34 of 92
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise38 of 88
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In reviews · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named GatherUp for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review and reputation management | Marketing | 0% | 34 of 92 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, GatherUp held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Reviews · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 27 → 33 of 86
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 86 → 36 of 84
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 34 of 92 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated GatherUp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated GatherUp across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels4
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative12 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Simpler, more focused tool for review generation and management at a lower price point” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative
“Often used for local review generation and post-purchase feedback workflows.” Perplexity Sonar · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for agencies: Grade.us, GatherUp” Kimi K2 · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for agencies and feedback/surveys” Grok 4.20 · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Starts at $99/month for one location, but scales down to $25/month for 101+ locations” MiniMax M2.5 · Reviews · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GatherUp, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GatherUp was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GatherUp, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GatherUp was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GatherUp. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named GatherUp and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
birdeye.com14
gatherup.comYour site14
usa.inquirer.net13
appfollow.io11
learn.g2.com11
viasocket.com9
zapier.com9
g2.com8
guideflow.com7
surveysparrow.com7
Eighty-nine of the 103 domain citations in answers naming GatherUp came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
gatherup.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, GatherUp takes 0% of first choices and Birdeye takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
gatherup.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, GatherUp takes 0% of first choices and Birdeye takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “online review management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best online review management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“gatherup”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,308 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,147 · 23 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,705
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 1 clicks and $58 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 34 of 92 in reviews
Segment leader
18%
Birdeye
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 21 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on gatherup.com
743
subdomains included
Content
508
counted in the table below
Documentation
189
Product · Integration
11 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 396 | 3 | 2026-09-13 | SEO, CRM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 73 | 0 | 2020-06-29 | SEO | |
| Report or ebook | 16 | 0 | 2022-03-04 | ||
| Case study | 10 | 0 | 2019-05-13 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2025-06-17 | SEO | |
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2024-02-02 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | 0 | 2024-07-03 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2026-02-03 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-13Reviews and ai summer 2026 blog
- 2026-07-11Reviews as evidence based generative engine optimization blog
- 2026-07-08How local consumers could use agentic ai in the future blog
- 2026-05-21Top takeaways from gatherups ampup 2026 blog
- 2026-05-06Gatherup april newsletter blog
- 2026-05-05Defining agentic search local businesses blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page gatherup.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (17); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as GatherUp
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as GatherUp; a claim can dispute any of them.
GatherUp (formerly Grade.us) 1
Follow GatherUp
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
GatherUp is its own company.ShowHide
The company
GatherUp is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The leading all-in-one reputation management platform for local businesses & digital marketing agencies for local SEO success through compliant online review generation practices.
- For
- local businesses & digital marketing agencies
- Price stated
- Simple, Affordable Pricing gatherup.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 99 gatherup.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start Your Free Trial gatherup.com
- Integrations claimed
- 500 gatherup.com/solutions/integrations
- Customers named
- Fuze 32One Firefly
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What GatherUp's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: gatherup.com, gatherup.com/pricing, gatherup.com/solutions, gatherup.com/solutions/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GatherUp's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GatherUp, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for GatherUp by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where GatherUp is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name GatherUp, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.