Small business=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 of 90, unchanged
1 category · RankedGrade.us
23Judge labels
4First choices
3Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Reviews for mid-market buyers
Rank 15 of 92 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Grade.us →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 97
4%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 92
2%12 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise17 of 88
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
In reviews · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Grade.us for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review and reputation management | Marketing | 2% | 15 of 92 | 8% | 12 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Grade.us held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Reviews · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 28 → 13 of 86
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 15 of 84
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 28 → 15 of 92 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Grade.us across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Grade.us across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels2
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative7 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best online review management platform for a mid-market B2B company is ReviewTrackers, Grade.us, or Bazaarvoice.” Llama 4 Maverick · Reviews · direct prompt · first choice
“For agencies needing white-label solutions: Grade.us offers strong reporting and branding options” MiniMax M2.5 · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative
“A mid-market-focused platform with strong white-label options and agency-friendly workflows.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Reviews · direct prompt · alternative
“1. Grade.us (now part of Broadly) - Specifically designed for mid-market companies” MiniMax M2.5 · Reviews · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“However, pricing has increased recently (now starting at $180/month for Professional plans in some cases)” Kimi K2 · Reviews · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Grade.us, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Grade.us was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Grade.us, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Grade.us was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Grade.us. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 23 answers that named Grade.us and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
birdeye.com12
usa.inquirer.net10
gatherup.com9
learn.g2.com9
viasocket.com9
swydo.com8
surveysparrow.com7
appfollow.io6
brightlocal.com6
capterra.com6
Eighty-two of the eighty-two domain citations in answers naming Grade.us came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
grade.us is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Grade.us takes 2% of first choices and Birdeye takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
grade.us is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Grade.us takes 2% of first choices and Birdeye takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “online review management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best online review management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- not counted (“grade.us”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,873 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,429 · 5 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,601
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 15 of 92 in reviews
Segment leader
18%
Birdeye
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 23 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 22 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on grade.us
431
subdomains included
Content
426
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 403 | 0 | 2024-12-05 | ||
| Case study | 8 | 0 | 2023-08-11 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 0 | 2021-04-07 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2021-02-09 | ||
| Comparison | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2021-01-10 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2024-12-05Glassdoor reviews blog
- 2024-12-03Healthgrades reviews blog
- 2024-10-29Bbb reviews blog
- 2023-08-25How often request a review from customers blog
- 2023-08-11Longhouse media case study case study
- 2023-08-10Best local search content blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page grade.us exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Grade.us
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Grade.us is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Grade.us is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the review management platform for marketing agencies
- For
- marketing agencies
- Price stated
- Our price point and easy but effective approach to review management means you can leverage our platform to generate more revenue without a lot of additional client work. grade.us
- Free plan or trial
- Start Your 14-day Free Trial grade.us/home
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Grade.us's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: grade.us/home, grade.us. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Grade.us's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Grade.us, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Grade.us by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Grade.us is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Grade.us, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.