AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Reviews › Podium vs Reputation
Review and reputation management · October 2026 Edition

Podium vs Reputation

One of fourteen models named Podium first on the direct prompt; one named Reputation. Podium was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Reputation by thirteen and Podium carries 38 labels and Reputation 28, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Podium

accepted challenger

Lehi, United States, founded 2013. Named in six categories this edition.

Reputation

criticized challenger

By Reputation.com, Redwood City, United States, founded 2006. Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate21%25%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels3828A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Podium reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Birdeye was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Birdeye vs Podium · Birdeye vs Reputation · ReviewTrackers vs Podium

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the review and reputation management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PodiumFirst choices, of fourteen modelsReputation
Direct111 against Podium
Paraphrase001 against Podium · 3 against Reputation
Comparative00
Budget-constrained003 against Podium
Scale-constrained00
Negative003 against Podium · 4 against Reputation
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Podium and Reputation were named in the same answer forty-six times, of the 126 answers naming Podium and the 114 naming Reputation. In those answers Reputation took the first choice two times and Podium one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Podium and Reputation stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Podium Reputation first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Podium on the left and Reputation on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Podium and Reputation stood in it.

Podium first, Reputation an alternative

1 of 14 modelsReputation was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
MiniMax M2.5Birdeye, Podium alternatives: Capterra, G2 Buyer Intent, Grade.us, Reputation

Reputation first, Podium not the choice

1 of 14 modelsPodium was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Perplexity SonarReputation alternatives: Birdeye, Reviewflowz

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniG2 Buyer Intent alternatives: Birdeye, Reputation
Grok 4.1 FastBirdeye alternatives: Podium, ReviewTrackers, Trustpilot, Yotpo
Mistral SmallBazaarvoice, ReviewTrackers alternatives: Grade.us, Podium
DeepSeek V4 FlashBirdeye alternatives: Grade.us, Reputation, Yext
GPT-6 LunaG2 Buyer Intent alternatives: Birdeye, Reputation
Muse Glimmer 30BReviewTrackers alternatives: Birdeye, G2 Marketing Solutions, Podium, Trustpilot

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5G2 Buyer Intent alternatives: Capterra, Clutch, Reviewflowz, TrustRadius
Gemini 3.5 FlashReviewflowz alternatives: Birdeye, HiFiveStar, Sprout Social, Trustpilot
Llama 4 MaverickBazaarvoice, Grade.us, ReviewTrackers
Qwen 3.7 FlashBirdeye, Pulse alternatives: Reviewflowz, TrustRadius, TrustSpot
Kimi K2ReviewTrackers alternatives: G2 Marketing Solutions, Reviewflowz
GLM 4.7 FlashXReviewTrackers alternatives: Capterra, G2 Buyer Intent

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Podium0%#10 of 11
Reputation0%#11 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Podium2%#3 of 9
Reputation2%#5 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Reputation leads by twenty-four points.
Reputation24%#2 of 9
Podium0%#9 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Podium

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Platforms to AVOID if You Have a Limited Budget ... Birdeye and Podium” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Stay away from Podium and Birdeye if budget is a concern” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“I'd scrutinize the contract and cancellation terms... BBB pages show recurring customer complaints about renewals, cancellation, billing, and support” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend starting with Birdeye or Podium as they balance features with mid-market pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Prioritize platforms with transparent pricing (e.g., Birch, SOCi, Podium \u2014 though even these deserve scrutiny)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
“I'd lean toward Podium instead if your main goal is simple review generation and customer communication” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · alternative

What the models said about Reputation

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Platforms to Be Cautious About ... Reputation.com ... BBB rating of D- ... Reputation.com and Yext are the two most consistently flagged *major* platforms in my research.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“avoid Reputation.com unless you're a large enterprise (it starts at ~$520/month and is overly complex for mid-market)” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“its software version receives mixed to negative reviews on platforms like G2 regarding usability and technical reliability” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“the strongest single pick from the results is Reputation because G2 explicitly labels it "Best for Mid-Market"” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“Reputation.com is another strong option, especially for managing customer reviews and local listings” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Reputation is another option, particularly if managing multiple locations is central to the job” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.