Customer feedback and surveys · October 2026 Edition
Survicate vs Alchemer
Two of fourteen models named Survicate first on the direct prompt; three named Alchemer. Survicate was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Alchemer by nine and Survicate carries 25 labels and Alchemer 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share5%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#7A position in a field of 15; printed, not drawn.
Labels2515A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Survicate reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CustomerGauge was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. CustomerGauge vs Survicate · CustomerGauge vs Alchemer · Google Forms vs Survicate
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the customer feedback and surveys page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
SurvicateFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAlchemer
Direct23
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained10
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Survicate and Alchemer stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | |||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Survicate Alchemer first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Survicate on the left and Alchemer on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Survicate and Alchemer stood in it.
Survicate first, Alchemer not the choice
2 of 14 modelsAlchemer was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniQualtrics CustomerXM, Survicate alternatives: CustomerGauge
Gemini 3.5 FlashCustomerGauge, Survicate alternatives: AskNicely, Refiner
Alchemer first, Survicate an alternative
3 of 14 modelsSurvicate was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.DeepSeek V4 FlashAlchemer alternatives: CustomerGauge, SurveyMonkey, Survicate
Kimi K2Alchemer, CustomerGauge alternatives: Retently, SurveyMonkey
GPT-6 LunaAlchemer alternatives: AskNicely, HubSpot Service Hub, SurveyMonkey
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Helply alternatives: Alchemer, Perspective AI, SurveySparrow, Survicate, Zonka Feedback
Perplexity SonarCustomerGauge alternatives: Alchemer, Chattermill, SurveySensum, Zonka Feedback
Grok 4.1 FastSurveyMonkey alternatives: Alchemer, Canny, Qualtrics CustomerXM, Refiner, Zonka Feedback
GLM 4.7 FlashXCustomerGauge alternatives: Alchemer, Chattermill, Zonka Feedback
Muse Glimmer 30BCustomerGauge alternatives: SurveyMonkey, Survicate, Zonka Feedback
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Mistral SmallPerspective AI alternatives: CustomerGauge, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Llama 4 MaverickCustomerGauge alternatives: Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey, Zonka Feedback
Qwen 3.7 FlashCustomerGauge alternatives: GetFeedback, SurveyMonkey, Zonka Feedback
MiniMax M2.5SurveyMonkey, Typeform alternatives: CustomerGauge, Qualaroo, Zonka Feedback
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Survicate leads by fourteen points.
Survicate14%#2 of 14Alchemer0%#– of 14Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Survicate5%#4 of 15Alchemer5%#7 of 15Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Survicate2%#6 of 10Alchemer2%#5 of 10What the models said about Survicate
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“If you mean the best fit for most mid-market B2B teams, I'd lean Survicate because it balances capability, speed, and cost better.” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“Survicate: Extremely user-friendly, excellent integrations with HubSpot/Salesforce/Zendesk, and highly customizable.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Digital Teams & CRM Sync: Survicate ... widely considered the best overall migration path” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Alchemer
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“I'd recommend Alchemer as the best all-around choice — it hits the sweet spot of power and price” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“My default pick: Alchemer—for a mid-market B2B company that wants more than a basic survey tool” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
“Alchemer offers the best balance of capability and complexity.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
CustomerGauge vs SurvicateCustomerGauge vs AlchemerGoogle Forms vs SurvicateGoogle Forms vs AlchemerRetently vs SurvicateRetently vs AlchemerSurvicate vs SurveyMonkeySurvicate vs SurveySparrowSurvicate vs AskNicelySurveyMonkey vs AlchemerSurveySparrow vs AlchemerAlchemer vs AskNicelyAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full feedback standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.