Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
“The Mailchimp / ActiveCampaign Trap:** Mailchimp and ActiveCampaign are highly recognizable, but they are incredibly expensive for growing businesses.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
“Users frequently criticize its interface as dated and clunky... often seen as a legacy choice rather than a modern growth tool.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
“**Avoid Mailchimp/ActiveCampaign/Constant Contact** at larger list sizes” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
“Charges for unsubscribes/inactives (unfair billing flagged in analyses), lower deliverability... dated interface” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
17 of 72 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 4 of 6 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 4 of those lists are Google grounding redirects that name no site and are left out of the counts. 175 links across 76 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. The other 2 models searched through a gateway that returned no source list on this edition.
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|
Flips between the edition run and its calibration repeat. Six prompts per model is a small sample; the index-wide floor is the number to trust.
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.