AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Marketing › Email marketing › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

Email marketing platforms for enterprise buyers

Asked as “email marketing platform”, and as “email marketing tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
29%
Contested · HubSpot Marketing Hub 29%
29Adobe Marketo Engage29HubSpot Marketing Hub11Salesforce Marketing Cloud32others

29% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: HubSpot Marketing Hub (34%) replaces Adobe Marketo Engage (23% then, 28% now), 6 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.HubSpot Marketing Hub leads at 34%, replacing Adobe Marketo Engage, which led at 23% and stands at 28% now: 6 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
ShowinginAll 112 categories in the October 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01HubSpot Marketing Hub29%19%68accepted challenger▲+13Since September 2026: 21% → 34%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.21% → 34%
02Adobe Marketo Engage29%6%35accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 23% → 28%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.23% → 28%
03Salesforce Marketing Cloud11%8%52accepted challenger▼−10Since September 2026: 19% → 9%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.19% → 9%
04Brevo9%38%16criticized challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 12% → 6%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 6%
05Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement4%0%15accepted challenger▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 4%
06ActiveCampaign4%36%42criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%
07Adobe Campaign2%4%25accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
08Oracle Eloqua2%10%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
09Klaviyo2%35%20criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13Mailchimp0%88%25criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
12Constant Contact0%86%14criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
11Iterable0%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
10Braze0%5%20accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01HubSpot Marketing Hub29%
02Adobe Marketo Engage29%
03Salesforce Marketing Cloud11%
04Brevo9%
05Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement4%
06ActiveCampaign4%
07Adobe Campaign2%
08Oracle Eloqua2%
09Klaviyo2%
10Braze0%
11Iterable0%
12Constant Contact0%
13Mailchimp0%

What they warned about

Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Mailchimp
88%
22 of 25 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 14 hard negative
“Standard tools like Mailchimp or Constant Contact generally cannot handle the volume, API requirements, or enterprise-grade security protocols” Qwen 3.7 Flash, paraphrase prompt
Constant Contact
86%
12 of 14 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 10 hard negative
“Users experienced issues with the platform's speed, limitations in automation capabilities... challenges with the platform's cost, especially for larger contact databases.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
ActiveCampaign
36%
15 of 42 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Avoid:** Trying to force a mid-market tool (like standard **ActiveCampaign** or **HubSpot**) to handle 10 million+ contacts.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
HubSpot Marketing Hub
19%
13 of 68 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“**Avoid:** Trying to force a mid-market tool (like standard **ActiveCampaign** or **HubSpot**) to handle 10 million+ contacts.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1025 links across 251 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

49 answers · 72 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Sequenzy47 answers · 72 citations · 12 models
vendor site · ZoomInfo35 answers · 44 citations · 11 models
vendor site · InsiderOne27 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Mailtrap26 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Brevo21 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Attentive17 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Moosend17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Salesforce16 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Hostinger16 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Klaviyo15 answers · 17 citations · 11 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 11 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best email marketing platform”, “email marketing platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
HubSpot parent site
HubSpot Marketing Hub 29%
29%934368,0009,776
Adobe parent site
Adobe Marketo Engage 29%, Adobe Journey Optimizer 0%
29%2991,220,000117,563
Salesforce parent site
Salesforce Marketing Cloud 11%, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement 4%
14%296550,00060,632
Sinch mailjet.com
Mailjet 9%
9%1612,100791
Brevo brevo.com9%38640,50032781,741$17,8471069
ActiveCampaign activecampaign.com4%44518,100307235,709$1,42432
Adobe Campaign adobe.com2%5072069242,010,966$9,855119
Oracle parent site
Oracle Eloqua 2%, Oracle Responsys 0%
2%108450,00066,611
Klaviyo klaviyo.com2%35390,5001,560200,057$57220
Sendinblue2%

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 11 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (brevo.com, mailtrap.io, ventureharbour.com). The first result for “best email marketing platform” is emailvendorselection.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best email marketing platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which email marketing tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade email marketing platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best email marketing platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an email marketing platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which email marketing platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5HubSpot Marketing Hub
Seven alternativesActiveCampaign, Adobe Marketo Engage, Braze, Iterable, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement, Sequenzy
HubSpot Marketing HubHeld
Two alternativesActiveCampaign, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
ActiveCampaign
Five alternativesAdobe Campaign, Braze, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Omnisend, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Brevo
Two alternativesEmailOctopus, Sender
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, Constant Contact, Klaviyo, Mailchimp
GPT-5.4 miniAdobe Marketo Engage
Two alternativesOracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
against: HubSpot Marketing Hub
Adobe Marketo EngageHeld
Three alternativesOracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Six alternativesAdobe Campaign, Adobe Marketo Engage, Braze, Iterable, Oracle Responsys, SAP Emarsys
against: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo
HubSpot Marketing Hub
One alternativeMailchimp
against: SendGrid
no first choiceagainst: Constant Contact, Mailchimp, MailerLite, Mailtrap, Postmark, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Gemini 3.5 FlashAdobe Marketo Engage, HubSpot Marketing Hub
Three alternativesActiveCampaign, Oracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
Adobe Marketo Engage, HubSpot Marketing HubHeld
One alternativeSalesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Five alternativesAdobe Campaign, Adobe Journey Optimizer, Braze, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Iterable
Brevo
Three alternativesBigMailer, Emma HQ by Marigold, Mailjet
against: ActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Four alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, Braze, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Iterable
against: AWeber, ActiveCampaign, Constant Contact, Flodesk, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, MailerLite
Perplexity SonarHubSpot Marketing Hub
Two alternativesActiveCampaign, ZoomInfo Marketing
against: Adobe Marketo Engage
HubSpot Marketing HubHeld
Three alternativesActiveCampaign, Adobe Campaign, ZoomInfo Marketing
HubSpot Marketing Hub
Five alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, Braze, Emma, Oracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Mailjet
One alternativeBraze
no first choiceagainst: Brevo, Constant Contact, GetResponse, Mailchimp, Omnisend
Grok 4.1 FastAdobe Marketo Engage, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
One alternativeOracle Eloqua
Adobe Marketo EngageChanged
Three alternativesActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Adobe Marketo Engage
Four alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, Oracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
against: ActiveCampaign, Brevo, Klaviyo, Mailchimp
Brevo, Mailjet
One alternativeActiveCampaign
against: Adobe Marketo Engage, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Oracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
HubSpot Marketing Hub
Five alternativesActiveCampaign, Adobe Campaign, Adobe Marketo Engage, Braze, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
against: ActiveCampaign, Brevo, Constant Contact, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo, Mailchimp
Mistral SmallHubSpot Marketing HubAdobe Marketo EngageChanged
Three alternativesActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Five alternativesActiveCampaign, Constant Contact, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo, Sequenzy
Mailjetagainst: ActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Marketing Cloudno first choiceagainst: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp
DeepSeek V4 FlashAdobe Marketo Engage, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
One alternativeHubSpot Marketing Hub
Adobe Marketo EngageChanged
Two alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
against: Oracle Eloqua
no first choice
Six alternativesActiveCampaign, Adobe Campaign, Braze, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
against: Mailchimp, Oracle Responsys
Klaviyo
Two alternativesAIT.com's Email Marketing, SendGrid
against: ActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, Brevo, Constant Contact, EmailOctopus, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, MailerLite, Moosend
Llama 4 MaverickHubSpot Marketing HubActiveCampaignChanged
Four alternativesIterable, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, Sequenzy
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaignMailjetno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashAdobe Marketo Engage
Three alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, Oracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
HubSpot Marketing HubChanged
Three alternativesAct-On, Oracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
against: Constant Contact, Mailchimp
no first choiceOracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Two alternativesAmazon SES, SendGrid
against: Kit, Mailchimp
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp
Kimi K2Adobe Marketo Engage
Three alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, Oracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
Adobe Marketo EngageHeld
Two alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
no first choiceHubSpot Marketing Hub
One alternativeSalesforce Marketing Cloud
against: ActiveCampaign, Adobe Campaign, Braze, Iterable, Mailchimp
no first choiceagainst: Benchmark Email, Constant Contact, Mailchimp, MailerLite, Moosend
GLM 4.7 FlashXAdobe Marketo Engage
Three alternativesActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
ActiveCampaignChanged
Three alternativesBrevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Four alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo
HubSpot Marketing Hub
One alternativeActiveCampaign
against: Mailchimp
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, Brevo, Constant Contact, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp, Mailtrap Email Marketing, Omnisend, SendX
MiniMax M2.5HubSpot Marketing Hub
Three alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
HubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account EngagementChanged
One alternativeAdobe Marketo Engage
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, Klaviyono first choiceAdobe Campaign, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
One alternativeCustomer.io
against: HubSpot Marketing Hub
against: Brevo, Constant Contact, Mailchimp
GPT-6 LunaAdobe Marketo Engage
Three alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, Oracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
Adobe Marketo EngageHeld
Three alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, Oracle Eloqua, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
no first choice
Nine alternativesAdobe Journey Optimizer, Adobe Marketo Engage, Braze, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Iterable, Klaviyo, Oracle Responsys, SAP Engagement Cloud, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Brevoagainst: HubSpot Marketing Hubno first choiceagainst: Constant Contact, Mailchimp
Muse Glimmer 30BSalesforce Marketing Cloud
Two alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, HubSpot Marketing Hub
Adobe Marketo Engage, Salesforce Marketing CloudChanged
Two alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, Oracle Eloqua
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Five alternativesAdobe Campaign, Adobe Marketo Engage, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo, Oracle Eloqua
against: ActiveCampaign
Brevo, Mailjet, Sendinblue
One alternativeAIT
against: HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, Constant Contact, Mailchimp
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 11:16yes97 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:42yes36 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 07:37yes1319 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 12:07yes183 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:56yes247 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 12:27yes52 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:40yes2227 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:56yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:53yes1530 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:30yes1427 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 13:06yes1920 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 13:35yes1016 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:26yes415 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:47yes1221 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:58yes97 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 10:00yes37 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:55yes822 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:26yes203 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:49yes195 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 13:40yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:17yes2330 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:36yes54 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:50no036 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:22yes1921 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:13yes1221 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:22yes515 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:51yes48 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 13:21yes1417 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:59yes97 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:58yes17 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:31yes1531 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:36yes195 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:56yes2310 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:24yes1210 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 12:52yes2351 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:41yes51 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 13:43yes1532 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:01yes2033 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:23yes23221 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:52yes1533 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:12yes927 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:25yes1534 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 13:26yes97 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:07yes36 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:24yes1734 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:20yes194 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:59yes208 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:29yes52 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 14:00yes2439 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:25yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:22no044 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 12:02yes2433 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:51yes2375 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:57yes1691 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:44yes217 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:11yes2339 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:15no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:29no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:44no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:08yes205 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:01yes1111 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:21no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 13:45yes1557 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 12:08yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:41no034 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:51yes1229 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:16yes1245 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:31yes520 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:34yes420 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:26yes1934 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:41yes169 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:13yes46 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:27yes1629 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 14:03yes194 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:20yes169 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 13:31yes117 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 10:25yes2357 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 13:45yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:17yes953 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 12:10yes2329 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:24yes1927 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:21yes2449 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:02yes225 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:55yes2258 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adobe read as Adobe Campaign
HubSpot read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
HubSpot (Enterprise) read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
HubSpot (Marketing Hub Enterprise) read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
HubSpot (Standard/Pro) read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
Hubspot read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
Salesforce read as Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
AIT
AIT.com's Email Marketing
BigMailer
Emma HQ by Marigold
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Email deliverabilityEmail signatures →