Digital asset management
Asked as “digital asset management system”, and as “DAM platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
45%
Clear leader
45Canto17Filecamp15Bynder23others
45% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▲+12Since September 2026: 34% → 46%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Canto held the lead, +12 points on 34%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Filecamp33%Contested▲+3Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Canto45%Clear leader▲+12Since September 2026: 34% → 46%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterprise
Bynder48%Clear leader▲+16Since September 2026: 33% → 49%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Filecamp33%Contested▲+3Since September 2026: 27% → 30%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketCanto45%Clear leader▲+12Since September 2026: 34% → 46%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseBynder48%Clear leader▲+16Since September 2026: 33% → 49%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Canto45%4%52endorsed leader▲+12Since September 2026: 34% → 46%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.34% → 46%
Canto45%4%52endorsed leader▲+12Since September 2026: 34% → 46%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.34% → 46%02Filecamp17%5%22accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 19% → 17%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.19% → 17%
Filecamp17%5%22accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 19% → 17%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.19% → 17%03Bynder15%18%55accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 15% → 15%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 15%
Bynder15%18%55accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 15% → 15%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 15%04
ResourceSpace6%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%
ResourceSpace6%0%17accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 4%05
Brandfolder4%9%45accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 4%
Brandfolder4%9%45accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 4%06
Acquia DAM2%5%21accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Acquia DAM2%5%21accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%07
Pics.io2%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Pics.io2%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
Air2%20%15accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Air2%20%15accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Adobe Experience Manager Assets0%47%30criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Adobe Experience Manager Assets0%47%30criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
Aprimo0%12%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Aprimo0%12%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
Cloudinary0%9%22accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Cloudinary0%9%22accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%11
MediaValet0%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
MediaValet0%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
Frontify0%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Frontify0%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Canto vs BrandfolderCanto vs Acquia DAMCanto vs Pics.ioCanto vs AirFilecamp vs BynderFilecamp vs ResourceSpaceFilecamp vs BrandfolderFilecamp vs Acquia DAMFilecamp vs Pics.ioFilecamp vs AirBynder vs ResourceSpaceBynder vs BrandfolderBynder vs Acquia DAMBynder vs Pics.ioBynder vs AirResourceSpace vs BrandfolderResourceSpace vs Acquia DAMResourceSpace vs Pics.ioResourceSpace vs AirBrandfolder vs Acquia DAMBrandfolder vs Pics.ioBrandfolder vs AirAcquia DAM vs Pics.ioAcquia DAM vs AirPics.io vs Air
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Canto45%
Canto45%02Filecamp17%
Filecamp17%03Bynder15%
Bynder15%04ResourceSpace6%
ResourceSpace6%05Brandfolder4%
Brandfolder4%06Acquia DAM2%
Acquia DAM2%07Pics.io2%
Pics.io2%08Air2%
Air2%09Cloudinary0%
Cloudinary0%10Frontify0%
Frontify0%11MediaValet0%
MediaValet0%12Aprimo0%
Aprimo0%13Adobe Experience Manager Assets0%
Adobe Experience Manager Assets0%What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Adobe Experience Manager Assets47%
14 of 30 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid if: you're a mid-sized company, use diverse tools, or need fast implementation.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Bynder18%
10 of 55 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid pricier ones like Canto or Bynder unless scaling up.” Grok 4.1 Fast, budget prompt
Brandfolder9%
4 of 45 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Platforms like Bynder and Brandfolder serve mid-market brand management needs but lack the lifecycle depth and governance infrastructure required at enterprise scale.” Muse Glimmer 30B, comparative prompt
Dropbox50%
4 of 8 labels negative · 3 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Reliance on generic tools like Dropbox/Google Drive as "DAM substitutes"—they lack metadata, rights management, and versioning.” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1075 links across 203 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
vendor site · Canto53 answers · 65 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Zapier35 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Templafy30 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 49 citations · 12 models
26 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Air24 answers · 31 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cloudinary24 answers · 30 citations · 12 models
vendor site · VNTANA23 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Frontify20 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Filecamp19 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
41 answers · 14 models
35 answers · 11 models
30 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 11 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best digital asset management system”, “digital asset management system”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canto canto.com | 45% | 145 | 22,200 | 11,609 | 81,784 | 65 | ||
| Filecamp filecamp.com | 17% | 72 | 590 | 0 | 11,252 | 17 | ||
| Bynder bynder.com | 15% | 217 | 6,600 | 136 | 94,929 | 62 | 5 | |
| ResourceSpace resourcespace.com | 6% | 39 | 590 | 5 | 10,427 | 0 | 4 | |
| Brandfolder brandfolder.com | 4% | 107 | 4,400 | 59 | 50,163 | 0 | ||
| Acquia acquia.com Acquia DAM 2% | 2% | 75 | 3,600 | 216 | 72,942 company | $2,943 | 92 | 7 |
| Pics.io pics.io | 2% | 25 | 390 | 7 | 84,455 | 6 | ||
| Air air.inc | 2% | 62 | 201,000 | 1,766,606 | 27,643 | $1,275 | 4 | |
| Widen | 2% | |||||||
| OpenAsset openasset.com | 2% | 5 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 12 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (cmswire.com, thedigitalprojectmanager.com). The first result for “best digital asset management system” is thedigitalprojectmanager.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best digital asset management system for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which DAM platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top digital asset management systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best digital asset management system for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a digital asset management system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which digital asset management systems should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5CantoCantoHeldno first choiceDaminionno first choiceagainst: Bynder
Three alternatives
Acquia DAM, Brandfolder, MediaValetTwo alternatives
Brandfolder, BynderFive alternatives
Acquia DAM, Aprimo, Bynder, Canto, CloudinarySix alternatives
AtroDAM, Brault, Filecamp, Phraseanet, Pics.io, ResourceSpaceGPT-5.4 miniBynderagainst: Box, OneDriveCantoChangedAdobe Experience Manager AssetsResourceSpaceagainst: Air, Dashno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Acquia DAM, Akeneo, Canto, Plytix, Sales LayerFour alternatives
Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Brandfolder, BynderSix alternatives
Acquia DAM, Air, Brandfolder, Bynder, Canto, CloudinaryOne alternative
FilecampGemini 3.5 FlashCantoCantoHeldno first choiceFilecampagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Brandfolder, Bynder, PimcoreAcquia DAM, Brandfolder, Bynder, Canto, Widenagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Dropbox, Google Drive, SharePointagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Box, Bynder, Dropbox, Google Drive, Orange Logic
Four alternatives
Acquia DAM, Brandfolder, Bynder, MassetFour alternatives
Acquia DAM, Brandfolder, Bynder, MassetEight alternatives
Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Bynder, Canto, Cloudinary, Frontify, LingoFour alternatives
Dash, Pics.io, ResourceSpace, Stockpress EssentialPerplexity SonarBynderBynderHeldno first choiceFilecampagainst: Airno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Brandfolder, Canto, FrontifyFive alternatives
Brandfolder, Canto, Filecamp, Frontify, MediaValetOne alternative
ResourceSpaceGrok 4.1 FastCantoCantoHeldagainst: Air, Bynder, Cloudinary, FilecampBynderagainst: Adobe Experience Manager AssetsFilecamp, ResourceSpaceagainst: Bynder, Cantono first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Bynder, Dropbox, Google Drive, NetX
Three alternatives
Brandfolder, Bynder, OpenAssetTwo alternatives
Acquia DAM, BrandfolderEight alternatives
Acquia DAM, Air, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Canto, Cloudinary, Filecamp, MediaValetTwo alternatives
AtroDAM, PimcoreThree alternatives
Air, Bynder, CantoMistral SmallCantoBynder, CantoChangedno first choiceFilecampno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Brandfolder, TemplafyOne alternative
TemplafyOne alternative
AirDeepSeek V4 FlashCantoBrandfolderChangedBynderFilecampno first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assetsagainst: Acquia DAM, Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Adobe Lightroom, OpenText Media Management
Three alternatives
Bynder, Filecamp, FrontifyThree alternatives
Bynder, Canto, FrontifySeven alternatives
Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Canto, Cloudinary, OpenText Media Management, Orange LogicFour alternatives
Dash, Pics.io, ResourceSpace, Stockpress EssentialLlama 4 MaverickCantono first choiceChangedno first choiceFilecampno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Brandfolder, TemplafyThree alternatives
Frontify, ResourceSpace, Stockpress EssentialQwen 3.7 FlashCanto, OpenAssetagainst: Adobe Experience Manager AssetsCantoChangedBynderagainst: AprimoFilestageno first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Bynder, Canto, DemoUp Cliplister, MediaValet, VNTANA
Two alternatives
Brandfolder, FrontifyTwo alternatives
Plytix, TemplafyFive alternatives
Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Brandfolder, Canto, Frontify, ResourceSpaceFour alternatives
Dropbox, Nextcloud Hub, OneDrive, SharePointKimi K2CantoCantoHeldno first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager AssetsFilecampno first choiceagainst: Canto Cumulus
Three alternatives
Brandfolder, Bynder, FilecampTwo alternatives
Brandfolder, BynderFour alternatives
Ci Media Cloud, ImageKit, Pics.io, ResourceSpaceSix alternatives
Acquia DAM, Aprimo, Brandfolder, Bynder, Canto, CloudinaryGLM 4.7 FlashXCantoCantoHeldno first choiceFilecampagainst: Bynderno first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Box, Brandfolder, Bynder, Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive
Three alternatives
Brandfolder, Bynder, FilecampThree alternatives
Bynder, MediaValet, Pics.ioTwo alternatives
Canto, ResourceSpaceMiniMax M2.5Bynder, CantoCantoChangedAdobe Experience Manager Assets, BynderAir, Cantoagainst: ExactTarget / other lightweight DAMs, PimcoreBynderagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assetsnothing named
Three alternatives
Frontify, MediaValet, OpenAssetOne alternative
TemplafyTwo alternatives
Brandfolder, CantoFive alternatives
Bynder, Cloudinary, Filecamp, MediaValet, ResourceSpaceFour alternatives
Air, Brandfolder, Canto, CloudinaryGPT-6 LunaCantoCantoHeldno first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, CloudinaryResourceSpaceno first choiceagainst: Adobe Experience Manager Assets, Brandfolder
Two alternatives
Brandfolder, BynderOne alternative
BynderTwo alternatives
Cloudinary, Pics.ioMuse Glimmer 30BBynderCanto, Pics.ioChangedAprimoagainst: BrandfolderFilecampno first choiceagainst: Bynder
Six alternatives
Aprimo, Brandfolder, Canto, Cloudinary, Frontify, WidenThree alternatives
Brandfolder, Bynder, MassetTwo alternatives
Adobe Experience Manager Assets, BynderTwo alternatives
Pics.io, ResourceSpaceBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:41 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:03 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 22 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 12 | 46 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:45 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:15 | yes | 18 | 82 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 14:12 | yes | 4 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:54 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:47 | yes | 23 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 14:11 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:35 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:39 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:09 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:54 | yes | 9 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:32 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 14:00 | yes | 17 | 106 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:19 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:55 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:08 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 21 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:46 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 13 | 59 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 19 | 36 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:18 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:24 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 16 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 19 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:09 | yes | 23 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 15 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 15 | 72 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:12 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 5 | 55 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:27 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 14 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:48 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:30 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:11 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:36 | yes | 20 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:53 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:19 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:49 | yes | 14 | 63 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:00 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:06 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:01 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:41 | yes | 26 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:23 | yes | 27 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 24 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:17 | yes | 20 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 25 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 25 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 19 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acquia read as Acquia DAM
Adobe read as Adobe Experience Manager Assets
Adobe Experience Manager read as Adobe Experience Manager Assets
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) read as Adobe Experience Manager Assets
OpenText read as OpenText Media Management
OpenText Digital Asset Management read as OpenText Media Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Adobe Assets
Adobe Lightroom
Arc XP Experience Platform
Bynder Widen (Acquia)
CrowdRiff
DemoUp Cliplister
ExactTarget / other lightweight DAMs
Flight by Canto
Frame.io
MediaVaunt
Mediavine
NetX
Nextcloud Hub
Nuxeo By Hyland
PhotoShelter for Brands
Pickit
Pimcore DAM
hyperCMS DAM Server
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.