AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Marketing › October 2026 Edition

Email marketing platforms

Asked as “email marketing platform”, and as “email marketing tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
35%
Contested · ActiveCampaign 28%
35HubSpot Marketing Hub28ActiveCampaign12Brevo25others

35% of first choices, contested.

Since September 2026↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: HubSpot Marketing Hub (32%) replaces ActiveCampaign (40% then, 30% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.HubSpot Marketing Hub leads at 32%, replacing ActiveCampaign, which led at 40% and stands at 30% now: 2 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
ShowinginAll 112 categories in the October 2026 Edition →

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01HubSpot Marketing Hub35%8%52endorsed leader▲+5Since September 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 32%
02ActiveCampaign28%11%56accepted challenger▼−10Since September 2026: 40% → 30%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.40% → 30%
03Brevo12%8%37accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 16% → 10%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.16% → 10%
04MailerLite9%21%28accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 4% → 10%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 10%
05Sender4%0%10accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 4%
06Klaviyo2%15%26accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
07Moosend2%9%11accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
08Mailchimp2%52%50criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13Adobe Marketo Engage0%50%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
14Constant Contact0%47%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
12GetResponse0%21%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
11Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
10Kit0%7%15accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
09Omnisend0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01HubSpot Marketing Hub35%
02ActiveCampaign28%
03Brevo12%
04MailerLite9%
05Sender4%
06Klaviyo2%
07Moosend2%
08Mailchimp2%
09Omnisend0%
10Kit0%
11Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement0%
12GetResponse0%
13Adobe Marketo Engage0%
14Constant Contact0%

What they warned about

Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Mailchimp
52%
26 of 50 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“One comparison explicitly says to avoid it if many contacts unsubscribe or bounce, because you may still be billed for them.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Constant Contact
47%
8 of 17 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Mentioned as a platform to avoid if you have a high list churn rate, as costs can escalate quickly.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Adobe Marketo Engage
50%
9 of 18 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Platforms to **Strongly Avoid**... notorious for poor out-of-box deliverability” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
ActiveCampaign
11%
6 of 56 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“some tools look affordable at small list sizes but leave the budget bracket quickly as subscriber counts rise, including **Mailchimp, ActiveCampaign, and Constant Contact**” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 863 links across 227 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

vendor site · Sequenzy33 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Mailtrap29 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ActiveCampaign24 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 34 citations · 11 models
vendor site · ZoomInfo20 answers · 31 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Sender20 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Hostinger20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · HubSpot19 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Mailchimp15 answers · 23 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best email marketing platform”, “email marketing platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
HubSpot parent site
HubSpot Marketing Hub 35%
35%934368,0009,776
ActiveCampaign activecampaign.com28%44518,100307235,709$1,42432
Brevo brevo.com12%38640,50032781,741$17,8471069
MailerLite mailerlite.com9%15749,50031159,716$851157
Sender sender.net4%1059,90010,34969,07813
Klaviyo klaviyo.com2%35390,5001,560200,057$57220
Moosend moosend.com2%381,9001971,5152
Drip drip.com2%2174,00076,84618,9966
Thryv keap.com
Keap 2%
2%286,60014530,6290
Mailercloud mailercloud.com2%4

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 11 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (emailtooltester.com, emailvendorselection.com, mailchimp.com, mailtrap.io, ventureharbour.com). The first result for “best email marketing platform” is emailvendorselection.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best email marketing platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which email marketing tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top email marketing platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best email marketing platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an email marketing platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which email marketing platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5HubSpot Marketing Hub
Three alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, GetResponse
ActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing HubChangedKlaviyo
Seven alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, Hostinger Reach, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Kit, MailerLite, Sender
Brevo, MailerLite, Moosend
One alternativeEmailOctopus
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, Brevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Kit, Klaviyo, Mailchimp
GPT-5.4 miniHubSpot Marketing Hub
Two alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
HubSpot Marketing HubHeld
One alternativeMailchimp
no first choice
Six alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, Constant Contact, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo, Mailchimp
MailerLite
One alternativeBrevo
against: Mailchimp
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashHubSpot Marketing Hub
Three alternativesActiveCampaign, Customer.io, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
against: Adobe Marketo Engage, Mailchimp, MailerLite, Oracle Eloqua
ActiveCampaignChanged
Four alternativesApollo.io, Brevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Instantly
against: Adobe Marketo Engage, Mailchimp, MailerLite, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
no first choice
Eight alternativesActiveCampaign, Beehiiv, Brevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Kit, Klaviyo, MailerLite, Omnisend
Sender
Six alternativesBeehiiv, Brevo, EmailOctopus, Flodesk, Moosend, Omnisend
against: Constant Contact, Mailchimp, MailerLite
HubSpot Marketing Hub
Eight alternativesActiveCampaign, Adobe Marketo Engage, Braze, Customer.io, Iterable, Klaviyo, Omnisend, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
against: Adobe Campaign, Mailchimp, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
against: ActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Kajabi, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, MailerLite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Marketing, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Squarespace, Wix
Perplexity SonarHubSpot Marketing Hub
Four alternativesActiveCampaign, Outreach, Salesloft, ZoomInfo Marketing
HubSpot Marketing HubHeld
Two alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo
no first choiceBrevo
Three alternativesMailerLite, Mailjet, Sender
against: GetResponse
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, Constant Contact, Mailchimp
Grok 4.1 FastHubSpot Marketing Hub
Two alternativesActiveCampaign, Adobe Marketo Engage
against: Mailchimp
ActiveCampaignChanged
Three alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, Brevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub
no first choiceBrevo
Four alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, MailerLite, Moosend, Sender
against: Mailchimp
ActiveCampaign
Five alternativesBrevo, GetResponse, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo, Mailchimp
against: Adobe Marketo Engage, Brevo, Email-list.com, Mailchimp, Oracle Eloqua
Mistral SmallActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing HubActiveCampaignChanged
Three alternativesBrevo, GetResponse, Moosend
Constant Contact
Eight alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, Drip, GetResponse, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp, Moosend, Zoho Campaigns
MailerLite
Three alternativesElastic Email, Sender, Zoho Campaigns
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, Constant Contact, Mailchimp, Moosend
DeepSeek V4 FlashHubSpot Marketing Hub
Three alternativesActiveCampaign, Klaviyo, Salesforce Marketing Cloud
HubSpot Marketing HubHeld
Two alternativesActiveCampaign, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
against: Adobe Marketo Engage, Klaviyo, Mailchimp
no first choice
Nine alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, Constant Contact, GetResponse, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, MailerLite, Omnisend
Sender
Two alternativesBrevo, MailerLite
ActiveCampaign
Three alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
against: Oracle Eloqua, SAP Emarsys, Zoho Campaigns
against: Benchmark Email, Constant Contact, GetResponse, MailMagma, Mailchimp, MailerLite, SendMails
Llama 4 MaverickActiveCampaign
Two alternativesDotdigital, Salesforce Email Marketing
no first choiceChangedno first choiceMailercloud
Three alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, SendPulse, Sender
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, Constant Contact, Mailchimp
Qwen 3.7 FlashHubSpot Marketing Hub
Four alternativesActiveCampaign, Adobe Marketo Engage, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement, SharpSpring
ActiveCampaignChanged
Two alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
no first choice
Six alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, Constant Contact, Drip, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp
MailerLite
Three alternativesBrevo, Kit, Omnisend
against: Mailchimp
ActiveCampaign, Drip, Keap, Klaviyo
Two alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp
against: Amazon SES, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, SendGrid
against: AWeber, Campaign Monitor, Constant Contact, GoDaddy Campaigns, Squarespace, Vertical Response, Wix
Kimi K2ActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing Hubagainst: Adobe Marketo Engage, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account EngagementActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing HubHeldagainst: Adobe Marketo Engage, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account EngagementMailchimp
Seven alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, Constant Contact, Drip, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo, Omnisend
Brevo, MailerLite
One alternativeMoosend
against: Mailchimp
no first choice
Five alternativesActiveCampaign, Braze, Emma, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Iterable
against: Brevo, Constant Contact, Mailchimp
GLM 4.7 FlashXHubSpot Marketing Hub
Three alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, Klaviyo
against: Adobe Marketo Engage
ActiveCampaignChanged
One alternativeHubSpot Marketing Hub
against: Mailchimp
Brevo, Mailchimp
Four alternativesActiveCampaign, GetResponse, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Omnisend
Brevo
Four alternativesMailerLite, Omnisend, SendGrid, Systeme.io
against: Mailchimp
no first choiceagainst: ActiveCampaign, Adobe Marketo Engage, Beehiiv, GetResponse, Mailchimp, MailerLite
MiniMax M2.5ActiveCampaign
Two alternativesHubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
against: Adobe Marketo Engage
ActiveCampaignHeld
Two alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, HubSpot Marketing Hub
no first choice
Seven alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Kit, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, MailerLite
Mailchimp, Sendinblue
Five alternativesAWeber, Constant Contact, GetResponse, Kit, MailerLite
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaHubSpot Marketing Hub
Two alternativesAdobe Marketo Engage, Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement
HubSpot Marketing HubHeld
Two alternativesActiveCampaign, Customer.io
MailerLite
Six alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Kit, Klaviyo, Omnisend
Brevo
Two alternativesKit, MailerLite
no first choiceagainst: Constant Contact, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Klaviyo, Mailchimp
Muse Glimmer 30BActiveCampaign, HubSpot Marketing Hub
One alternativeAdobe Marketo Engage
against: Mailchimp
HubSpot Marketing HubChanged
One alternativeActiveCampaign
against: Mailchimp
Klaviyo
Five alternativesActiveCampaign, Brevo, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp, MailerLite
Brevo
Three alternativesMailerLite, Moosend, Zoho Campaigns
against: Mailchimp
no first choiceagainst: Benchmark Email, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Mailchimp, SendMails, SendPulse
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:23yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:36yes34 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 07:56yes1321 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:10yes193 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 12:54yes2310 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:04yes94 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:18yes1517 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:44yes51 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:23no029 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 13:01yes1921 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:39yes1539 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:56yes922 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:25yes422 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 12:05yes1223 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 13:16no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:15yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 10:55yes1225 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:21yes194 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 07:27yes157 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:57yes52 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:51yes1725 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 08:34yes51 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:32yes513 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:40yes1417 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:24yes1070 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:53yes1229 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:11yes38 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:03yes1217 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 13:41yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:35yes88 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 08:41yes1824 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:46yes196 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:24yes229 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:17yes86 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:09yes2037 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 09:16yes54 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 07:38yes525 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:38yes1422 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 12:16yes1545 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 09:36yes517 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 14:11yes835 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:49yes1527 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:04yes107 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:29no03 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:49yes1019 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 12:43yes193 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:00yes145 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:49yes94 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:07yes2025 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:41yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:37no026 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:53yes815 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:22yes1544 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 13:43no025 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 08:29yes37 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:27yes1318 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:34no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:08no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:43yes1024 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 13:22yes185 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 13:54yes137 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 08:02no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:54yes1017 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:22yes52 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 12:52no028 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:39yes1921 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:25yes1049 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 14:16yes513 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:03yes219 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:01no03 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 12:35yes179 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 11:57yes57 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:47yes1218 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 09:32yes204 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:06yes229 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:05yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 14:05yes2450 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:31yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 10:20no039 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 11:36yes2532 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 10:04yes25212 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:21no013 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 13:27yes524 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:38yes2137 s

Noise floor in this category

Flips between the edition run and its calibration repeat. Six prompts per model is a small sample; the index-wide floor is the number to trust.

ShowHide
Claude Haiku 4.5
4 of 4 flipped
GPT-5.4 mini
0 of 3 flipped
Gemini 3.5 Flash
3 of 5 flipped
Perplexity Sonar
2 of 4 flipped
Grok 4.1 Fast
4 of 5 flipped
Mistral Small
2 of 4 flipped
DeepSeek V4 Flash
3 of 6 flipped
Llama 4 Maverick
3 of 3 flipped
Qwen 3.7 Flash
3 of 4 flipped
Kimi K2
5 of 6 flipped
GLM 4.7 FlashX
3 of 4 flipped
MiniMax M2.5
3 of 3 flipped
GPT-6 Luna
1 of 4 flipped
Muse Glimmer 30B
5 of 5 flipped

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
HubSpot read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
HubSpot (Marketing Hub Enterprise) read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
HubSpot (Marketing Hub) read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
Unresolved, counted raw
Elastic Email
Email-list.com
GoDaddy Campaigns
MailMagma
Vertical Response
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Email deliverabilityEmail signatures →